Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Thursday 07/19/07

No Committee Fight Expected on COOL

WASHINGTON (DTN) --- Some of the biggest news Wednesday night at the House Agriculture Committee markup of the 2007 farm bill was out in the hallways talking about what the committee won't debate.

Barring any wildcards on the committee Thursday, backers of mandatory country-of-origin labeling appear to be winning out at the committee level. It's unlikely the committee will have any amendments to re-interpret what classifies as product of U.S. or how to label products like hamburger.

The committee could take up a COOL amendment on Wednesday, but it's appearing less likely.

The difference makers here are Tom Buis, president of the National Farmers Union, and Lou Dobbs, host on CNN.

Buis made it clear that if the Agriculture Committee weakens the current COOL law, then he will push supporters to hit the floor during the full House debate and raise all of the ills coming out of imported food scares. That made people wanting to soften COOL to rethink their strategy.

House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., has gotten the pro and con people on COOL to agree to allow Buis and a long-time livestock-meat industry lobbyist Randy Russell to work with Peterson and the committee's Ranking Member Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. They will deal with penalties, how to label hamburger and an agreement on origin of a live animal.

Then there is what is now the Lou Dobbs effect. Since Monday, Dobbs has picked up the mantle of COOL supporter, spending large segments of his show in CNN questioning why COOL isn't already in effect. Dobbs has vowed to keep pounding on the issue to the point he has called USDA on the carpet to appear on the show and justify what's going on at the department on implementing the law.

As one leader of a pro-COOL group said Wednesday night: "The stars are lining up for us."

Quote of the Day

Lawmakers were getting a little punch-drunk around midnight as some colleagues kept bringing up amendments in nutrition program, looking for more money to fund healthy eating or anti-obesity programs. After about the fourth amendment on anti-obesity issues, Peterson chirped,

"This isn't no-diet-left-behind."

Posted at 6:40AM CDT 07/19/07
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
September2010
S M T W T F S
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30      
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Time for NCBA and R-CALF to Cease and Desist
  • Egg Recall Threatens Consumer Confidence
  • Grassley: E-15 Expected by January
  • To Hear or Herd a Cattleman
  • Some Press Releases From Fort Collins
  • Fear and Loathing in Fort Collins
  • GOP Senators Question USDA Bias on GIPSA Rule
  • DeLauro Wants Answers About DeCoster
  • When a River Runs Through It
  • Agenda Set For Fort Collins Competition Meeting
  • Killer Bees After 2012 Farm Bill
  • Vilsack: USDA Looking at Ad-Hoc Disaster Package
  • Breaking Down the Senate Fall Campaigns
  • Chicken Group Pushes Letter Campaign on GIPSA Rule
  • Senators Champion GIPSA Rule
  • A Look at House Races That Could Affect Agriculture
  • The Wal-Mart Factor in Ag Competition
  • Producers Need to Pay Attention to CFTC
  • Bill Would Eliminate Pesticide Permit Questions
  • Finding Ways to Create Unequal Treatment