DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Wednesday Oct 21, 2009

UT Study Shows Huge Biomass Revenue Potential

The New York Times reports Wednesday that President Obama will give a speech focusing on climate change and green energy Friday at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

http://www.nytimes.com/…

The climate bill, starting on Friday, will begin to get serious emphasis in policy discussions again. The Times states Obama's speech will be pegged to the release also on Friday of an EPA economic analysis of the Senate-proposed bill, the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act, or CEJAPA.

Also on Friday, and the Times didn't have this (snort), the University of Tennessee will release a study on Renewable Energy Standards and how those standards will impact agriculture. The report is being done for the 21st Century Agriculture Policy Project and will be released in Washington on Friday. According to the findings, Renewable Energy Standard policies "are expected to create a large new market for biomass from the agricultural and forestry sectors, and as a result, to have a positive effect on farm income, according to the study. Under a 25% RES policy in 2025, the study projected that increases in gross receipts range from $9,419 per farm in Florida, $11,283 per farm in Colorado, $16,028 per farm in North Carolina and $43,229 per farm in Kansas."

To note here, I wrote about a Missouri biomass farmer cooperative in early September that is selling biomass to coal plants in the state because of a Renewable Energy Standard in that state. The farmers are not only making money selling the biomass, but taking advantage of a new USDA program that matches payments of up to $45 per ton as well.

The House climate bill has a national 20 percent RES by 2020. The Senate bill right now has a 15 percent RES standard.

Further, "Preliminary results from the study also show that increased demand for biomass feedstock is substantial under all RES policy cases considered. However, the size of the new market will vary by state and by level of the RES targets typically resulting in a larger market for biomass," The University of Tennessee study states.

But adding $43,229 income per farm in Kansas by 2025? Well, nobody's capping anyone's future there!

The full report will be released Friday at the Capitol with representatives from the National Farmers Union and National Milk Producers Federation, along with other agricultural organizations. The study was done by the Bipartisan Policy Center.

http://bipartisanpolicy.org/…

Also, on Oct. 27, I'll be hosting a free webinar on climate legislation. If you are interested in registering, go to. http://bit.ly/…

I can be found on Twitter at chrisclaytonDTN.

Posted at 08:16AM CDT Oct 21, 2009 by Chris Clayton
Comments (1)
Chris: I greatly respect your opinion and your expertise, but in this case I would invite you to investigate the cost side of agriculture as well. Under cap and trade, the cost for capital equipment, energy, herbicides, seeds, fertilizer, and transportation will be rising so significantly that it will swamp the potential for revenue increases. Furthermore, the weakness of the economy brought on by this legislation will crater the demand for the very biomass upon which you are basing your revenue assumptions.
Posted by tom vogel at 03:22PM CDT Oct 22, 2009
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
Blog Home Pages
November 2009
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30               
Subscribe to DTN Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Growth Energy Wants CA Carbon Rule Revisited
  • Farm Bureau Praises Delays on Climate Bill
  • Biofuel Policies on the Table in December
  • Lincoln Gearing up For 2010 Campaign
  • Oklahoma Pushes Wind Revolution
  • USDA, DOJ Meetings Set
  • Senators on Allowances, Obama in Japan
  • Climate Not Changing in Senate
  • Rules Coming for SURE
  • NFU Urges Passage of Health Care Bill
  • Climate, Windmills and Checkoffs on the Agenda
  • Soybean Growers Spell Out Climate Bill Concerns
  • Farm Bureau Opposes House Health Care Bill
  • GOP Ranking Members Caution Boxer on Climate Bill
  • Classifying Carbon Subsidies in Trade
  • NFU Balances Out Climate Arguments
  • Climate Notes From Tuesday
  • Climate Focus Begins in Senate
  • A Few Minor Scheduling Issues in Washington
  • Writing About Infrastructure