Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington DTN Livestock Analyst

Wednesday 11/25/09

Tag NAIS Dead But Not Gone

(meatingplace.com) -- A coalition of 100 agricultural groups have sent two letters -- one to USDA and one to Congress -- urging that the National Animal Identification System be dissolved, according to a release by R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America.

Pointing out that the 2010 Agriculture Appropriations Bill reduced NAIS funding to $5.34 million, without specifying how those funds were to be spent, the coalition asked Congress to "refocus [USDA] on measures that truly improve animal health and … respect the interests of both livestock owners and consumers."

R-CALF and other organizations oppose the NAIS program, saying it will burden small farmers with high costs of implementation in favor of a larger, vertically integrated system.

Sort & Cull Comments

: With all due respect for organizations like “American Goat Society,” “Cattlemen’s Texas Longhorn Registry,” and “The Cornucopia Institute,” members of this letter-writing coalition probably shouldn’t get too cocky about their political clout as the current version of the NAIS is allowed to fade into the sunset.

The voluntary approach to national animal identification has been dying a slow death almost since the proposal first took shape in 2002. Indeed, the naively ambitious scheme has actually bled to death from a thousand cuts, slashed by concerns ranging from cost to privacy to freedom of religion.

Earlier this year, the USDA launched a series of dog and pony shows called “listening sessions,” as if some basic problem of communication and clarification was the only thing holding the NAIS back. I thought it was like dragging a corpse around the country and asking for volunteers to perform CPR or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

My guess is that Secretary Vilsack has finally figured out where the smell is coming from. Furthermore, advocates of animal identification will probably stay underground for the foreseeable future. Between health care and Afghanistan and the economy, the Obama Administration is not likely to spend any political capital in this direction anytime soon.

Yet if the government has been naïve about selling a voluntary program, I think critics of NAIS are fooling themselves if they think these issues are just going to blow away. Those inside and outside the livestock industry with legitimate worries relative to animal and human health, homeland security and foreign trade will eventually put this matter back on the public table in a different form.

And if that form is “mandatory,” the good folks at “Freedom 21” and ”Paso Fino Horse Association” are sure to like the idea even less.

For more Harrington comments check out www.feelofthemarket.com.

(KM)

Posted at 4:44PM CST 11/25/09 by John Harrington
Comments (8)
I have never believed that the government could run NAIS even if it was mandatory. The management skills and the technology are only available in the private sector. In 2002, five industry companies came together to form the Beef Information Exchange to show how NAIS could be accomplished economically in the private sector. This would have eliminated the concern over black helicopters swooping down to count all three of your cows. It was demonstrated to USDA and the public. USDA smiled politely and walked away to try to reinvent the wheel with government jobs and expenditure. The five companies disbanded and several went out of business or otherwised moved on because they couldn't compete with the government. Just as it took 911 to cause us to tighten our security as a nation, it will require a national tragedy in animal health such Foot and Mouth disease to cause these 100 signers to come running to the government for help, subsidies, and to be made whole again after years of keeping their heads firmly in the sand. The sad part is that the human tragedy that will acompany the animal health event will be far greater than anyone can imangine at this time.
Posted by BILL MIES at 9:47AM CST 11/27/09
The groups and individuals that oppose NAIS are not naive. We are well aware that USDA and Big Ag are just looking for another way to foist this boondoggle on us. Since NAIS is nothing more than an international marketing program created by the WTO and OIE, the groups that want it had better find a way to keep it amongst themselves. NAIS is NOT a food safety plan and it WON'T stop a disease from spreading. It will however, open up our borders wider and put us at greater risk of getting a foreign disease. Just as 9/11 was used to push through the unConstitutional Patriot Act, I wouldn't put it past USDA to create a disease situation so they can push through the unConstitutional NAIS. BTW, FMD doesn't kill livestock - the government does.
Posted by Barbara Steever at 11:01AM CST 11/27/09
Hi Barbara. Sorry, while I agree that USDA isn't much of a brain trust, I don't believe it would engage in a disease conspiracy. That's too paranoid. You may object to the NAIS plan, but the Washington is well-intended if sometimes inept. Bill's point is a good one. The private sector could do a better job in this regard but clearly it won't get done without some kind of government hammer. I guess I'm unsure as to the real benefits to animal and human health that a comprehensive ID program would provide. But we live in a world where perception can be more powerful than facts. Just think of our agonizing struggle to convince the Pacific Rim of the safety of U.S. beef. Right or wrong, it sounds like our trading partners are going to demand more and more in terms of animal identification. Do U.S. producers value privacy so much that they're will to letting some other more accommodating beef exporter have the biz?
Posted by John Harrington at 11:59AM CST 11/27/09
Bill, It is not black helicopters, it is corporate market control! NAIS does NOTHING for disease prevention or food safety, NOTHING! In fact, it lowers international standards to invite the disease into our country and will lower cattle prices. The grocery shelves will be stocked with high priced foreign meat that is NOT inspected by the USDA. If you would take your head out of the clouds, then you see about 3 major meatpackers. Plain and simple this is a hostile takeover by the corporations with government paying and paving the way. Has it worked for the poultry, pork or dairy producers? NO!
Posted by Marsha Dodson at 12:05PM CST 11/27/09
Bill, NAIS affects people who aren't selling beef overseas, and I value my private property rights that will be lost when a premise ID is issued. I've actually asked Neil Hammerschmidt to clarify that issue for me, and he never gave me a straight answer. What does that tell you? As a horse owner and private citizen, I refuse to give up my civil rights so Big Ag can import and export livestock more easily. I also dislike the added risk that my horses may face when USDA allows piroplasmosis infected horses across our border to compete at the WEG in Kentucky next year. Read about that here: http://www.bizlex.com/Articles-c-2009-10-29-90223.113117_WEG_2010s_toughest_jump.html Are you still sure they wouldn't deliberately allow a foreign disease in? It may not be a conspiracy, but the only other explanations are stupidity or greed.
Posted by Barbara Steever at 12:38PM CST 11/27/09
John, I accidently responded to Bill, but my comments to you are the same. Conspiracy or not, NAIS is a bad idea for anyone not involved with imports and exports, and it is a further taking of our civil rights that are guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. The government may not be able to take our rights by force, but they certainly will if we hand them over based on false promises of "protecting" us".
Posted by Barbara Steever at 2:20PM CST 11/27/09
Barbara--I really do share some of you concerns with the intrusiveness of government. Don't mean to suggest it's a black or white situation, because animal ID definitely cuts both way. Let's hope there's a way we can better serve the needs of animal health and the demand of our foreign customers while still preserving an important a certain level of privacy and confidentiality. You may think you're outside the concerns of imports and exports, but I would argue that everyone has a vested interest in a strong agricultural economy, a concern that must be increasingly sensitive to the nature of global demand. I hope we can find some kind of balance. Thanks JH
Posted by John Harrington at 7:18PM CST 11/27/09
The major issue is that giving up ANY right to engage in international trade should never be mandates in a free country. As I have said a million times, can you imagine George Washington's men following him through Valley Forge, barefoot, starving, in the snow, to require that my goat have a birth certificate? Please...And for what? Participation in international trade that 1) We truly do not need 2) Is only beneficial for a very few people 3) Isn't something we should cow tow to since we have not produced enough beef for our own consumption since the 70's The only way to do this and remain within Consitutional parameters is to specifically allow people to meet requirements through the EVS and allow all others the complete and fully informed decision for themselves. It would create two markets, but it is within the purview of the SPS agreement to mark and differentiate animals that are intended for export OR domestic use, and those which are only for domestic use. Otherwise you will have civil war on your hands. And I for one do not want that and have worked dilligently to stop that from happening.
Posted by Doreen Hannes at 8:07AM CST 11/28/09
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
September2010
S M T W T F S
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30      
Subscribe to Harrington's Sort & Cull RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Japanese Demographics and U.S. Beef
  • Pork Processors Pooh-Pooh Politics
  • The Cattle Dashboard
  • Pork Producers Pay Price For U.S. Duplicity
  • A Stronger Yen for U.S. Beef
  • Meat Inspector Strangelove
  • Steering the Titanic?
  • 30-Month-Old Breast Implants
  • Shoring Up The Leaky Dike of MPR
  • Better Late Than Never
  • Japan's Twisted Diet
  • Political Extensions
  • Is That Barbecue Sauce On Your Shirt Or Just Red Ink?
  • Putting Lassie Down
  • JBS Hikes Captive Supplies
  • The High Cost of Predictability
  • Kissing Your Sister
  • Painfully Cautious Optimism Concerning China
  • Call Pork Anything But Late To Dinner
  • Memo To BK: Reorder