Minding Ag's Business

Options for Washed Out Acres

Another band of severe weather is convincing some Iowans and Minnesotans to idle corn acres in 2013.




For the last 20 years, even after the deluges of 1993, it was rare for anyone in the prime Corn Belt to elect a prevented planting claim, unless they farmed near river bottoms. While Prairie Pothole soils in the Dakotas captured the vast majority of this insurance indemnity year after year, that won't necessarily be the case in 2013. In fact, in Iowa alone, state Secretary of Agriculture Bill Northey counts 2 million acres of corn and 5 million acres of soybeans left to plant. "Mostly too wet to plant and replant now," he tweeted May 28.

The Risk Management Agency designed Prevented Planting rules to be the last resort kind of claim, so with only a 60% payment, they are notoriously skimpy compared to planting a crop (even late) with much fuller insurance coverage. What's more, growers with revenue policies who elect this option no longer qualify for the automatic price adjustment should prices rally by harvest (that was a 32% higher payment in 2012 compared to the spring price). Maybe that's hopeful thinking, but markets are full of surprise.

However, several unusual scenarios are prompting top-notch corn growers in Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri and Wisconsin to think the unthinkable and sit the year out (see "Some Corn Growers Call It Quits" on Farm Business page). It's not something insurance agents are recommending this early, but growers are grappling with the reality. Parts of Iowa received 9" of rain last week, and 26 counties more than 3", with more on the way this week. They say they need a good week or more of dry weather to plant before yield losses are too severe--or the risk and expense of drying a high moisture crop with meager yields compounds the financial damage.


Secondly, growers have fewer pre-plant investments than normal. Many didn't forward price much of their crop this season, so they won't need to buy themselves out of contracts. If seed can be returned and fertilizer or pre-plant herbicides weren't applied, it's easier to make the decision to walk away from the crop, especially if commodity prices don't bounce past the $5.65/bu. spring planting guarantee for corn.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

"If market prices were rallying--say to $6.20 or higher, I'd have to reevaluate," said Eric Hawbaker of Howard County, Iowa, who has only planted 420 of his 1,400 corn acres and none of his 500 acres of soybeans. He's leaning toward taking a prevented planting claim if fields don't dry up by June 10, rather than switching to soybeans. "But right now the market is still trading a 13 billion or 14 billion bu. corn crop, even though 10% of the crop may not get planted."


Before you jump to conclusions, review how the math on prevented planting works: Basic prevented planted coverage pays at 60% x $5.65 x APH yield x coverage %, so someone with a 220 bu. APH yield and 80% coverage would claim about $597/acre. If a grower didn't pay excessive rent, or already sink $250/acre into fertilizer or apply pre-plant herbicides, that's enough to breakeven but take home little to no profit. Keep in mind, a 170 bu. APH yield and 75% coverage generates only $432/acre. (With most Iowa soybean growers, the indemnity only runs about $300/acre, so you can see why they don't want to get stuck with a prevented planting soybean claim on land that qualifies now for corn.)

RMA rules have many caveats, so contact your agent for your specifics, but here's a general guideline:
--Land must be insurable. In other words, no first-year Conservation Reserve land, land with cattails and other wetlands properties, or land that has not been planted and brought to harvest in at least one of the last four years.

--Others in the surrounding area must be affected by the same conditions. In other words, if everyone else got their crop planted and you did not, the claim will be denied.


--Your affected acres must meet the minimums. That's greater than the lesser of 20 acres or 20% of the insurable crop acres in the unit. The acreage that was prevented from planting does not need to be contiguous.


--You must report election to your insurer no earlier than the final planting date and no later than 72 hours after you determine you are unable to plant the crop. This must be no later than 72 hours after the late planting dates (June 25 for corn in most of the Midwest, for example, so you don't need to make your decision Memorial Day week).


Remember, you have the option to keep planting within the 25 days after RMA's "final" planting date, it just reduces your coverage 1% per day. So an 85% policy becomes an 80% policy after 5 days. You have the expense of planting and harvesting a crop, but there's no 60% reduction on claims as there is with prevented planting.


This is one of the toughest choices growers must make, because of so many unknowns, such as potential yield damage from late planting and whether that might be offset by higher market prices on what you do harvest. Iowa State University is touting its insurance calculator to help you decide. But what would you do?







Marcia Zarley Taylor on Twitter@MarciaZTaylor

(SK)

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Unknown
6/7/2013 | 5:46 AM CDT
Bill Bilson apparently you didnt even read or at least understand the article. There is no profit in PP. How does a crop that gets planted late and gets frosted feed any of the world except the people who make tractors, fertilizer, bank farm managers, and in city landowners, These are the people that I see going by pulling their huge boats to the Lake.
Paul Beiser
6/5/2013 | 9:40 PM CDT
there will be tens of thousands of PP ac. in s.MN and n.IA ... I has been close to non stop rain for 3 weeks. just my opinion but some farmers try to run more land than they are capable of dealing with in difficult years. planting beans as option B just isn't going to happen.
Jarrod Bennett
6/3/2013 | 12:51 PM CDT
Marcia, your last comment is of great value to growers. Use PP as an avenue of LAST RESORT, because of these ambiguous and complex rules, one could be left holding their hat in their hand when their claim is denied. My advice is always (in order) plant the intended crop, switch to a second crop when it is no longer feasible to plant the intended crop and lastly, file PP when all hope is lost for that second crop to make. Advice to growers: if you haven't finished planting your corn, call your agent NOW and notify them. They should be opening a PP claim on you so you have options if the second crop can't get planted either.
John Olson
6/1/2013 | 4:58 PM CDT
One option is growing cows. Does not work for everyone though. See http://muscatinejournal.com/business/where-s-my-cow-insurance/article_12a3291c-5daf-57cd-9ecc-56b92e1d896e.html
John Olson
5/31/2013 | 1:03 PM CDT
When government assumes the role of guarantor of land rents a whole lot of individuals are getting their networths turbocharged with this largess. Included in these would be landlords, farmers owning land free and clear or otherwise, bankers, and obviously those employed in the government crop insurance complex and larger farmers. For decades the beneficiaries of the largest subsidies and guarantee packages are most likely those with the greatest net worths as well as the most acres farmed. In other words government is targeting the greatest benefits to those who are the least needy of the help.
Marcia Taylor
5/31/2013 | 12:18 PM CDT
RMA's handbook has 146-pages of rules regarding Prevented Planting. An industry expert e-mailed to say: "BE VERY CAREFUL PROVIDING PP INFORMATION!!! THIS IS DANGEROUS TERRITORY. Rules are ambiguous, adjusters judgment varies, some insurance companies have different rules." He recommends documentation of weather for folks desiring to bullet proof their PP claims. What was the rainfall amount? What is affect on that soil type? What is the preplant land preparation? What is the available working days?
Marcia Taylor
5/31/2013 | 12:08 PM CDT
Yesterday University of Illinois economist Gary Schnitkey weighed in with interesting calculations on prevented plantings. "Prevented planting is an attractive alternative this year, particularly if you've taken a high insurance coverage level of 85% or 80%," he said in a podcast on FarmDoc daily. If you've pre-applied alot of N fertilizer, you'll have incentive to plant though. http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/evaluating-prevented-planting-corn.html Without accounting for $300 to $400 cash rents, fertilizer applications of $150/acre or more, pre-plant herbicides or other "sunk" costs, Schnitkey estimates someone with 80% RP coverage and 180 APH yield would collect $445 from PP. That coverage would cover that overhead, essentially a breakeven or no profit option depending on your situation. On other hand, a 151 bu. corn crop planted 6/6 could return $388/acre in his example, without accounting for rent. So it's a close call, but that depends on a lot of variables in your situation. I don't see many people getting rich on either choice unless your land costs are free. Go to farmdoc for more http://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2013/05/evaluating-prevented-planting-corn.html
John Olson
5/30/2013 | 1:53 PM CDT
$597 per acre annual lottery award for prevented planting. A certain number of the lottery's awardee's only invested $500 per crop acre for their cropland and less originally. The $97 certainly would certainly cover real estate taxes and a couple of applications of roundup. $500 net would be a 100% ROI. Most economists would consider that an obscene profit. For those who inherited land or were gifted their cropland obviously the ROI would be higher. 5000 acres corn base - $2.5 million net for no crop - should be a few dollars to reelect a corrupt congesssman for the dude with no land debt.
Bill Billson
5/30/2013 | 11:43 AM CDT
It is sad that crop insurance guarantees a profit which gives us incentive to sit on our butts instead of trying to feed the world. I hope this open' s congress's eyes and they make us pay 100% of the premium if we are gonna profit on an already heavily subsidized program while we spend all summer basking at the lake. I hope the hardworking taxpayers in this country do not find out about this waste and abuse!
Marcia Taylor
5/30/2013 | 10:39 AM CDT
DTN's MBAg Columnist Adam Erwin farms in the swamped out corridor in Iowa and Minnesota and has been emailing his personal analysis. here's a sample of what he plans to do given he's only 70% finished on corn and has virtually no soybeans in the ground: Looking over the Iowa State University link to their extension pamphlet, it's way out of synch for the prime area of IA and MN with problems. APH yields are too low. Doesn't factor in the diff between sunk and recoverable costs. Option 1. Take PP. Don't plant corn. Get a check for $475 to $500, lose the nitrogen, reset for 2014 Option 2. Plant corn, costs $300-$400 to grow and dry, pick 30% on Thanksgiving in the snow, have guarantee of $725 ish. My best case scenario with 145 bu corn at $6.50 is about $50 higher than PP. Why risk it? Option 3. Plant beans. Landlady doesn't wonder why you don't farm. However, your revenue guarantee is only $525 ish. And they cost you $200 to grow. Best case scenario with 48 bu beans at $15? Again, only $50 or so higher than PP and you have risk and expense. Nobody with a pencil and a calculator is going to plant corn after June 1 north of I-80. --Adam Erwin