Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Zarley Taylor DTN Executive Editor

Monday 02/01/10

Estate Taxes Enter the Twilight Zone

Family business owners haven't quit dying just because Congress has failed to resolve the estate tax dilemma. And that has Midwest CPAs and tax attorneys who handle farm estates anxiety ridden and pleading for lawmakers to clarify how it plans to tax estates in 2010 and beyond.

"We're frustrated, indecisive and worried about malpractice," says Gary Streit, a CPA and estate tax attorney who heads the firm of Shuttleworth and Ingersoll in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. With political deadlocks on major controversies like health care and climate bills, Streit is losing faith that a quick resolution on what most considered a mildly controversial estate tax issue is even possible.

"I've given up thinking I can guess what Congress is going to do," he says.

Since the $3.5 million federal tax exemption on estates expired Jan. 1, estates have been hanging in a type of tax-free Twilight Zone. Congress might do something retroactively, then again, who knows. Theoretically, there's no federal estate tax on deaths in 2010, but a $1 million limit is scheduled to reappear in 2011--along with a higher tax rates on big estates--unless Congress acts. More important, inherited property no longer receives a "step up" in tax basis, essentially forgiving all the capital gains that occurred during the decedent's lifetime.

"Getting a new tax basis at death is vastly more important than action on federal estate taxes," tax attorney and Iowa State University professor emeritus Neil Harl told an ag audience last month. That provision "affects everyone up and down the income scale," he adds, while estate taxes have largely affected only a handful of wealthy individuals up to now. But the new carryover basis treatment "has not gotten the attention it deserved. When Congress passed this provision in 2001, there probably weren't five people in Congress who understood how important tax basis was," Harl says.

Take the predicament of an Indiana farm family: Their grandfather purchased farmland after World War II at a mere $116 per acre, and it's been in production ever since. Today they estimate it would sell at auction at around $4,500 per acre. Under current tax rules, they would owe capital gains based on the difference between the sales prices and the $116 basis, if they later sold the inherited property.

As a stop gap measure, IRS will allow estates to exempt the first $1.3 million in potential capital gains and an additional $3 million for a spouse. But this solution poses complex side effects for larger estates, based on the unknowns of future tax rates. Planners don't want to transfer $3 million to a surviving spouse now to temporarily solve the basis problem, only to expose the estate to a $1 million or higher estate tax obligation in 2011 or later, Streit says.

Documenting a decades-old tax basis also creates a paperwork nightmare for tax attorneys, Streit says. Stock and mutual fund splits are probably most cumbersome, but even land transactions pose issues. Generally title insurance policies or abstracts don't include purchase prices, so you'd need access to a deed to calculate sales prices based on the transfer tax at that time, Streit says.

If property was inherited through an estate, you'd need to get access to original court records. "We don't know what standard of care IRS will hold to taxpayers, but we'll reach a point of diminishing returns as legal fees increase," he says.

Until a few months ago, tax planners had been assured that Congress would simply extend the $3.5 million estate tax exemption and a maximum 45 percent tax rate past 2009. Now Streit says many Iowa farmers could find themselves in tax shock territory in 2011, should the $1 million tax exemption come to pass.

With Iowa farmland valued at $5,000 to $6,000 an acre, just average sized 600- to 700-acre farms could owe sizable federal estate taxes starting in 2011. Plus, another two dozen states still impose their own estate taxes. Family business owners and their advisers need tax clarification, Streit argues.

"If Congress would just tell us what they're going to do, we'll adjust," Streit says. "But holy moly, I don't know what to tell clients what to do at the moment. It's preposterous."

Posted at 10:46AM CST 02/01/10 by Marcia Zarley Taylor
Comments (14)
This is just another example of the current state of dis-function of our current Congressional leadership. The majority leadership wants to extract as much tax revenue as possible from business or farm owners; therefore, has fought against the middle of the road proposals brought to them for consideration in the last several years. These people have their own elitist agenda and could care less about the business and farm owners who have helped build this country. It is time for the citizens who care about the future of this country to carefully study the candidates who run for office this fall and vote these elitists (who aren't listening to the wishes of the people) out of office!
Posted by Unknown at 5:31PM CST 02/01/10
The other people at fault is us. Specifically farm organizations such as Farm Bureau using inflammatory "death taxes" to stymie any attempt at reasonable reform. Former ND Senator Mark Andrews had a reasonable solution a long time ago -- a 15% capital gains tax on all appreciated property at the time the estate passes to heirs, plus a stepped up basis. Can't remember if he included an exemption, I personally don't think it should be much. People with modest estates who sell property they have accumulated for income during their retirement pay the tax on all or nearly all their property. People who have built up large estates are able, under previous law, to exempt huge chunks of their wealth from any taxation and then we "correct" that with an excessive tax. Makes no sense to me. I agree that a stepped up basis is critical. That allows property to be bought and sold without undue consideration of paying huge taxes after the estate is settled.
Posted by LeeFarms at 8:45AM CST 02/02/10
There is no way to sugar coat this, it's just bad governance.
Posted by MATT ELLIOTT at 11:49AM CST 02/02/10
Why are taxes bad governance? I'm a conservative, yet I see people demanding this and that from the government, including conservatives wanting farm payments, and yet when it comes to devising taxing programs to pay for it all, the response is "tax someone else." THAT is bad governance! The historical idea of taxation is to tax wealth (first) and then later income. If the idea is to tax wealth, then the accumulation of it during life, and the passing it on to heirs untaxed creates a system that favors accumulation (think European noblemen). A system that keeps taxes at a reasonable level favors paying the tax and property turnover, stimulating "best use" of land and property.
Posted by LeeFarms at 7:18AM CST 02/03/10
I am appalled how many of us farmers think we are entitled to no taxes and government subsidies. What makes us better than wage earners in town? My brother is a wage earner and he works harder than me yet he doesn't get the subsidies and tax breaks I get as a farmer which really isn't right. Farmers also make much, much, more that the typical wage earner so why shouldn't those "better off" be taxed as well?
Posted by Bill Billson at 10:16AM CST 02/03/10
I'm not saying taxing is bad governance, what I'am saying is that creating an environment of uncertainty creates a lot of costs. Nobody wins in that situations except attorneys who fight it out in court. Congress should have done something, whatever it is, but they didn't because they couldn't come up with a compromise. Now we are in limbo land, and estates that have to transfer this year won't know what they have to pay for years. That is bad governance.
Posted by MATT ELLIOTT at 3:16PM CST 02/03/10
The accumulation of an estate usually occurs over many years. How does this wealth accumulation occur? By making money in the buisness or through investments, which are taxed each year as income taxes or capital gains. Therefore, in my eyes, paying estate taxes upon death or transferring a buiness is nothing more than double taxation. A farmer can continue to defer income taxes year to year, until he/she quites farming. At which time the taxes will be paid.
Posted by Unknown at 7:07PM CST 02/03/10
Which segment of the US economy has grown in value and employment during the past decade while other segments decline and fail ? The Elitest camp will be coming to suck the equity out of the Agriculture Sector as they have in Manufacturing & the Financials. What easier way than taxes , inflation , and increased interest rates. Concentrate the assets to make acquision easier . case in point , ethanol distilleries which sell for cents on the dollar after they fail for one reason or another. One reason is the necessity of GOVT SUBSIDIES . Meatpacking is another component that gets equity wrung out on a regular basis. And the list goes on and on. HUSU is another of the Elitest factions that are trying to concentrate livestock production for reasons that are entirely different than they would like you to believe. Do you really believe that they care if a sow is bedded down in wheat straw ? If we rely on livestock production methods of the '60s there will be a lot of meatless meals served!! At age 72, I have seen it all evolve over the last 60 years from the WAY OF LIFE to a Business which concentrates equity and wealth which is more easily regulated and taxed .
Posted by james kuntz at 11:04AM CST 02/04/10
I think it makes sense to set the estate tax rate at 15% or at a rate that is nearly comparable to the capital gains rate. This would reduce or eliminate obstacles in transition planning by allowing pre-death sales and post-death sales to the next generation at similar rates. A stepped up basis and small exemptions should be allowed. It is not double taxation when the appreciation is due to market factors. It is double taxation when the appreciation is due strictly to inflation. That is why both the capital gains and estate rates should be pretty low. Senator Mark Andrews was right.
Posted by James Stover at 10:20AM CST 02/05/10
Three cheers for Bill Billson. I agree 100 percent. Well said and refreshing.
Posted by Unknown at 1:23PM CST 02/06/10
Think of the estate tax of 35% on farms and ranches as one more member of the family. If you only pass to one heir they will only get 65% of the farm. What if you have more than one heir then the government is getting a bigger share than either family member with 32.5% each. This has over simplified the tax code because there are benefits when estates are properly planned. The only problem with most farms and ranches is do they have the cash flow to pay for sound legal and financial advice to preserve the family farm. I don’t know of many ranches that can lose 35% of their assets and the remaining 65% be divided between two or more heirs and be a viable business for both. The cash flow from most ranches doesn’t support the original family much less after the estate tax is paid. Even if the land is sold to another farmer and kept in agriculture the estate tax is still making farm families seek “off” farm jobs to support their agriculture lifestyle. The founding fathers established a system to prosper without redistributing wealth. Now farmers are taxed on the income of the farm which is acceptable for the United States standard of living gives us. When you add the death tax, the current system is pushing more and more young farmers out of business. Since the smaller farm after the sale or the cash needed to pay off the estate tax has left them in a position they can’t support their families.
Posted by Justin Platt at 8:33AM CST 02/08/10
Thanks for the clarification, Matt. I agree that not getting this fixed by January 1 is bad governance. I remember back when the legislation was passed with this goofy spot, and everyone said "Oh, they'll fix by then that's 6 years away." Guess the laugh is on us, but it's not funny. Justin, the current system, where estates have favorable tax treatment but no stepped up basis actually favors the accumulation of land in larger holdings by families, because if they sell after receiving it, they WILL have a big tax bill. This makes it more likely they will hold the land and rent it out rather than put it on the market. We need land to be fairly "liquid" to make farming profitable.
Posted by LeeFarms at 6:37AM CST 02/09/10
You guys articulate some of the big policy issues with estate taxes, but I don't expect Congress to get radical or creative at this stage, even though our policy landlocks farm estates and keeps elderly people owning property long after their careers have ended. We've been aware that estate taxes would sunset for almost a decade, and the debate has taught us: (1) the majority in Congress wants to exempt "middle class" estates from tax, but that cutoff could be $3.5 million or $5 million (2) top rates on the excess could be anywhere from 35% to 55% and (3)step up in basis solves a lot of administrative problems. Matt id'd the critical point--creating all this unnecessary uncertainty creates a lot of excess costs to small business owners and families.
Posted by Marcia Taylor at 10:45AM CST 02/09/10
The appreciation in land should be adjusted for inflation before it is taxed. 30 acres at $200 would buy you a car in 1980 and 30 acres at $1,000 would buy you a car today. Why should you be taxed on a gain of $800 that didn't gain you anything.
Posted by Art Lee at 2:57PM CDT 05/26/10
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
July2010
S M T W T F S
            1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Subscribe to Minding Ag's Business RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Time is Ticking on Tax Time Bomb
  • Stampede to Refinance
  • Can Estate Tax Reform Save the Last Farm?
  • Guilty on Fuel Buys?
  • What's Wrong With ACRE?
  • VIP Farms Tilt Global Grain Markets
  • In Former Soviet Union, Converting Capitalists is Harder Than We Think
  • Investors Seek Safe Haven in Farmland
  • Aren't Farm Programs Worthless Anyway?
  • Think of ACRE as a Cheap Option
  • Ask the ACRE Specialists
  • Rethink Antipathy Toward ACRE
  • Agri Europe's Green Challenge
  • Biotech in Belgium
  • "Smart" Money's Infatuation With Farmland
  • Bounce Left in Land Values
  • Picking Sides On Health Insurance
  • IRS Targets CRP Rents
  • Test Drive Brazil on Cheap Cash Rent
  • Last Minute Crop Insurance Tips