Ag Policy Blog

IPCC: Climate Change is Likely, Very Likely and Extremely Likely

Chris Clayton
By  Chris Clayton , DTN Ag Policy Editor
Connect with Chris:

"Warming of the climate system is unequivocal," the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated in its first sentence to a report to policymakers on Friday.

The IPCC, as it is known, released its first report since 2007 on the science behind climate change. In its press release Friday, the IPCC stated at the top, "Human influence on the climate system is clear."

Such a report is another scientific breakthrough in modeling what will happen to the Earth's atmosphere, temperatures and weather volatility. But the report leaves everyone to answer for themselves, "What does this mean to me?"

The impact of climate change as the global population continues to rise should be a statement high in an IPCC report, but the scientists don't draw such understandable conclusions.

For agriculture, it should mean globally that weather will increasingly become more volatile.

Climate change is happening because of continued pumping of greenhouse-gases into the atmosphere driven by fossil fuels.

P[L1] D[0x0] M[300x250] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

The scientists sought to dispel the argument advanced by some scientists and groups that temperature increases stopped in 1998. IPCC experts noted that 1998 was characterized by the second strongest El Nino year in the 20th century, which has a warming effect.

"Each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at the Earth’s surface than any preceding decade since 1850. In the Northern Hemisphere, 1983–2012 was likely the warmest 30-year period of the last 1,400 years."

Adverbs fill the report, particularly "likely," "very likely" and "extremely likely." Adverbs create uncertainty when we hear or read them. For the scientists, though, the adverbs are shorthand "to indicate an assessed likelihood of an outcome or result." If a statement is "virtually certain," there's a 99-100 probability of the cause or outcome. If something is "extremely likely", then it's at 95% certain. "Very likely" is a 90% probability and "likely" is at least a 66% probability.

Some statements from the news release and summary to policymakers:

It is "extremely likely" that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. The warming that has already occurred is "unequivocal," the report states. "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia."

Heat waves are "very likely" to occur more frequently and last longer.

Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is projected to be "likely" to exceed 2.2 degrees F (1.5.C) and fall in a range to as much as 8.6 degrees F (4.5 C). A lot has been made of the fact IPCC has lowered its floor from 3.6 F to 2.2 F in the 2007 report. As the IPCC stated, the lower temperature limit of is less, but the upper limit is the same.

It is "very likely" that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that spring snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere will continue to decline as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease.

Some people are going to continue to hang their arguments on the 5% uncertainty. Just last week, the Heartland Institute pre-empted the IPCC report with its own panel of 40 scientists who took the likelihood from climate models and concluded, “Scientists have not been able to devise an empirically validated theory proving that higher atmospheric CO2 levels will lead to higher global average surface temperatures."

To offer an analogy, the IPCC report is like telling a guy who builds his home next to the Missouri River that he should insure against the risk of a flood because there's a 95% likelihood that the house would end up underwater during the life of the loan. Heartland and others counter the risk with, "So you are telling me that there's a chance ..."

Friday's report was the first of four reports that will come from the IPCC over the next year.

A summary of the IPCC report can be found at http://dld.bz/…

P[] D[728x170] M[320x75] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]
P[L2] D[728x90] M[320x50] OOP[F] ADUNIT[] T[]

Comments

To comment, please Log In or Join our Community .

Bonnie Dukowitz
10/2/2013 | 6:10 AM CDT
For what it is worth, Don. I have always acknowledged climate change, as many do. In my lifetime, global cooling was going to destroy us, now it is now global warming. Recognizing climate change was taught to many of us while many of these "Enviros" were still in training pants. Many in agriculture were always good caretakers of "Mother Nature", while still providing abundant food to allow the citiots burgers, hot dogs and beer while watching the football game. Recreational tillage on our farm has never occured. Driving 40 miles to save a nickel on a box of tissues, does not happen. One of my points is that Algore mentality, which seems to be a very narrow perspective is not the solution to the issue. When the "Enviros" get off thier agenda, more progress might happen. Could it be, the opposition to the Keystone is led by the owners of the railroads and the Teamsters stirring up the Enviros?
Vince Moye
10/1/2013 | 5:46 AM CDT
When the oceans are clear of ice and more moisture is in the air, of course it snows a little more where it is the coldest on a small point in the arctic. Your fridge gets more frost when you put something in it that is uncovered and moist. Just physics not hype.
Jay Mcginnis
9/30/2013 | 11:30 AM CDT
Wonder if Curt worries about Harry getting his work done, he wrote the same thing 3 times, but Harry is right about asking who funds the papers, could it be the Koch brothers who are struggling or that super rich Al Gore?! Anyhow we don't have to worry too much about man made climate change, most of the problem will go to our children so keep it up guys, those chatkas made in China for Wal- Mart will keep us all fat and happy, especially Exxon and big Coal! Let the next generation clean up the mess, right?
Harry Siemens
9/30/2013 | 8:57 AM CDT
I cannot believe this biased, very biased reporting or column. You have ignored the fact Artic ice mass increase by 29 percent.. Does Al Gore fund this paper?
Harry Siemens
9/30/2013 | 8:55 AM CDT
I cannot believe this biased, very biased reporting or column. You have ignored the fact Artic ice mass increase by 29 percent.. Does Al Gore fund this paper?
Harry Siemens
9/30/2013 | 8:54 AM CDT
I cannot believe this biased, very biased reporting or column. You have ignored the fact Artic ice mass increase by 29 percent.. Does Al Gore fund this paper?
Don Thompson
9/30/2013 | 8:20 AM CDT
Harry, Maybe 29% over last year, the lowest recorded ice level in our time! The trend is still down. Knowing from your math, 29% of nothing is still nothing. Read the title here, man. THE PROGRESSIVE FARMER!! Read some Farm Bureau rag if you want to know what they thought in the Stone Age. And do not forget, so far Al Gore has been correct.
Harry Siemens
9/30/2013 | 8:08 AM CDT
I cannot believe this biased, very biased reporting or column. You have ignored the fact Artic ice mass increase by 29 percent.. Does Al Gore fund this paper?
Don Thompson
9/30/2013 | 8:03 AM CDT
Has John Olsen changed his moniker to "unknown unknown"?
Don Thompson
9/30/2013 | 7:51 AM CDT
Bonnie, You are so entertaining. Your response's can be predicted nearly word for word, or is it your ability to stay on message?? Your response does reflect Roosevelt's quote describing a conservative. "A man with two perfectly good legs unable or afraid to take a step forward. At the same time, it is quite progressive that you now validate climate change and possibly even accept human influence.
Bonnie Dukowitz
9/28/2013 | 6:55 AM CDT
No doubt there is climate change. The question is: What are we going to do about it? Continue making it impossible to do business in this nation. Like the other pollution issues, force the Walmarts and the others to that emmission perfect, China. I read the article to state, "Global". I think the largest problem is that those who think they have the solution are the worst contributers.
Curt Zingula
9/28/2013 | 6:31 AM CDT
I'd say its "extremely likely" that we will have climate change - always have, always will. Perhaps its even more "likely" than Jay M. spending more time on the internet than getting his work done!
ubknown unknown
9/27/2013 | 10:59 PM CDT
About all top weatherman can predict is 3 or 4 days. See http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/092713-673002-ipcc-global-warming-models-projection-wrong.htm
Jay Mcginnis
9/27/2013 | 12:02 PM CDT
But we can't afford not killing ourselves, what would this do to oil corporations bottom line this quarter if we tried to change to renewables? Lets see what Faux News has to say about it, I am sure there are some leaked emails somewhere!