The U.S. Department of Agriculture has several websites and activities relating to carbon and climate change:
http://www.usda.gov/…
**
Information on research projects relating to cropping and carbon by the National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/…
**
USDA Fact Sheet from the Agricultural Research Service http://www.usda.gov/…
**
Fact Sheet on the Farm Service Agency and Conservation Reserve Program
http://www.usda.gov/…
**
USDA analysis of the impacts of climate change legislation on agriculture. Testimony by USDA's chief economist:
http://www.usda.gov/…
**
Trading Programs
Information on the Chicago Climate Exchange greenhouse gas emissions offset program
http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/…
**
University studies on carbon offsets, climate change and agriculture:
Kansas State University's Agricultural Economics Department conducted a comparison of various studies on the impacts of climate legislation to the agricultural sector and the economy.
http://www.agmanager.info/…
**
Bio-Based Energy Analysis Group and Agricultural Policy Analysis Center, both at the University of Tennessee reported that a properly crafted cap-and-trade program could boost agricultural income $209 billion by 2025. Net returns for agriculture and generate up to $13 billion in annual additional revenue for agriculture and forestry. Eight of nine crops analyzed showed higher returns. The study showed carbon offsets and bioenergy crops would also generate $364 billion more in net returns for agriculture than allowing the Environmental Protection Agency to create regulations
http://bipartisanpolicy.org/…
**
http://beag.ag.utk.edu/…
**
Duke University led a study that concluded farmers would gain more markets from climate legislation, leading to higher prices for commodities as a result. Like the University of Tennessee study, the Duke report concludes there would be more crops grown for biomass and energy production as well.
http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/…
**
Texas A&M's Agriculture & Food Policy Center examined how 98 different farms and ranches from across the country would perform under climate legislation from 2012 through 2016. In that study, in which carbon ranged in prices from $8.97 per ton to $13.37 per ton, 71 out of 98 farms would have lower ending cash reserves under the House climate bill relative to a baseline set for net income.
http://www.afpc.tamu.edu/…
**
The Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State University and the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri each released reports in July examining higher costs for farmers from the climate bill.
The FAPRI report projects a typical Missouri farm would see a 3.2 percent increase in production costs by 2020. The CARD projection forecasts a 1.49 percent increase in production costs for Iowa corn and soybean growers by 2020.
http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/…
**
http://www.card.iastate.edu/…