NEWS
Interpretive Rule Seen as Invalid
Todd Neeley DTN Staff Reporter
Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:21 AM CDT

OMAHA (DTN) -- Fifteen state attorneys general have asked EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy to withdraw a rule that even agency officials have said created confusion in the agriculture community.

The so-called interpretive rule identified 56 conservation practices that are exempt from Clean Water Act regulations, so long as they meet Natural Resources Conservation Service specifications. Many agriculture interest groups and farmers have expressed concern that the interpretive rule would turn the NRCS into an enforcer of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

In a letter to McCarthy last month, the attorneys general asked EPA to withdraw the interpretive rule and instead ...

Quick View
  • Betting on Shorter Beans Researchers at the University of Nebraska and Purdue University have pinpointed a gene that produ...
  • Super Food Silage has never gone out of fashion in Bath County, Kentucky, even when the lure of $6- to $8-pe...
  • Farmers Pivot Back After Storms The majority of center pivots damaged by severe weather earlier this summer in Nebraska are up an...
  • Pick Contingency Plans - 3 As crop prices and insurance coverage swoon, farmers may need to supplement incomes with federal ...
  • Weathering the Drought Parts of the panhandle and western Oklahoma are still considered as being in extreme or exception...
  • AFBF Appeal The American Farm Bureau Federation asked a federal appeals court to reverse a lower court's Sept...
  • Pick Contingency Plans - 2 Commodity payments are largely capped at $125,000 per person. People must also report under $900,...
  • Ask the Vet Some tips on fly control.
Related News Stories
Betting on Shorter Beans
Do a Yield Checkup
Rediscovering Grain Sorghum
Weathering the Drought
Farmland: Trophy or Investment?
Klinefelter: By the Numbers
Who Burned the Beans?
Rates Too Low Too Long
Under The Covers
Land Conversion May Be Overstated