Farm Program Countdown - 2
Marcia Zarley Taylor DTN Executive Editor
Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:09 PM CDT
(Page 1 of 2)

DALLAS (DTN) -- Farmers from Minnesota, the Delta and the Texas Gulf Coast share little in common as far as geography, crops or farming methods. But three real producers from those regions will be tapping the new farm program's Price Loss Coverage (PLC) option for at least a portion of their base acres come the sign-up deadline March 31.

Mississippi grower Jeremy Jack will likely split his decision, going with PLC on crops like peanuts and rice but ARC-County for corn and soybeans. (DTN photo by Marcia Zarley Taylor)

While most of the northern U.S. Corn Belt stands to collect significantly more from county-based Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) than PLC over the next five years, not all situations or crops are created equal. Reference prices for peanuts, long-grain rice and sorghum are set high enough to trigger potentially larger 2014 PLC payments, most farm bill calculators conclude.

Complicating the choice for other crops is that ARC-County will outgun PLC as long as: (1) Your county yields are not above average; and (2) USDA's marketing year average price for corn runs over $3.30/bu., soybeans over $7.80 and wheat over $5.50, advises University of Illinois economist Gary Schnitkey. Those thresholds favor ARC in 2014, but should prices nosedive further in 2015 and beyond, PLC could be favored in the out years.

With so many choices, three growers with three distinct strategies demonstrate why it's important to tailor farm program decisions based on individual circumstances and crops.


Minnesota farmers are supposed to win the ARC-County lottery this year, thanks to disastrous yields and an expected 2014 Marketing Year Average corn price that's fallen 48% since 2012. In some parts of Minnesota, that combination could translate into $73/base acre ARC-County corn payments for 2014 crops, University of Illinois calculators show, versus a mere $25/base acre for PLC. Soybeans might collect $3/base acre, versus zero for PLC.

The problem for a 10,000-acre Minnesota grain producer, who asked that his name not be used, is his business structure. This real operator, his wife, his son and several employee-owners are active managers in the business, but are eligible for only one joint $125,000 payment limit. That equates to the payment on slightly less than 2,000 base acres of corn.

"We're organized as a limited liability partnership because we wanted to keep the business simple for financing and operations," said the farmer, who also finishes hogs and cattle. Because he raises specialty crops like kidney beans, he never valued building a base and yield history in the past. Now "it just isn't worth reorganizing to collect government payments," so he plans to hedge his bets by enrolling some of his crops in ARC and the remainder in PLC.

The strategy here is that since PLC triggers on price only, it may pay in later years where high county yields could offset an ARC payment, as some Illinois counties will experience in 2014. Alternatively, ARC could pay when his county hits normal or below-average yields.


In Belzoni, Miss., diversified farmer Jeremy Jack will split his ARC-PLC choices on a crop-by-crop basis. Almost 100% of the counties where peanuts, canola, barley, flax, sunflowers and grain sorghum are grown fare better with PLC than ARC-County, studies by the University of Illinois show. So it's no surprise Jack will choose PLC on rice (a potential $51 to $102/base acre payment) and peanut coverage ($68 to $182/base acre). In both instances, ARC isn't likely to pay anything. On cotton's generic base, Jack intends to plant peanuts this year.

  PREVIOUS |   1    |  2  | NEXT 
Related News Stories
View From the Cab
Senior Partners - 1
White House Pushes Broadband
View From the Cab
GAO Seeks Insurance Cuts
She's Got It All
New Paths
Russ' Vintage Iron
View From the Cab
Farm Program Countdown - 1