Jerry Gulke DTN Columnist
Mon Jan 6, 2014 07:28 AM CST

December 2013 ended on a negative note. What little profit-taking that occurred wasn't enough to move grains higher or anywhere near what I thought should have happened. Perhaps the fact that 2013 coverage on production was woefully small in comparison to other years came into play, as well as the desire to sell any type of rally.

The non-producer Has been negative about putting money into commodities in general and even low prices relative to one year ago have not been enough to entice re-entry (see last week's column). I had hoped for a 25-to 30-cent rally after an early ...

Quick View
  • Is Your Burndown Working? A cool, wet spring and the spread of herbicide-resistant weeds mean farmers should take the extra...
  • Gains on Covers It took Jerry Doan several years and a lot of trials, but the North Dakota beef producer has lear...
  • Side-by-Sides and Cool Helmets Side-by-side manufactures continue to roll out new machines and machine updates. Here are two more.
  • Stress Test for Borrowers Farm finances rate an "A" now, but economists debate if that's good enough to handle a major corr...
  • Senators Question EPA A group of U.S. senators Wednesday told President Barack Obama that his administration has not fo...
  • Climate Work Ahead at USDA Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack spoke about GOP complaints regarding the Obama administration's work wit...
  • Full-Circle Farming Bill Couser sees farming as a full circle. If it comes off the farm, it can go back into the farm.
  • Making the Grade What if corn isn't cheap the next five years? Fickle price projections can sway farm bill choices.
  • Ask the Vet What's my best bet for fly control?
Related News Stories
DTN's Quick Takes
DTN Before The Bell Grain Comments
DTN Early Word Opening Livestock
DTN Early Word Grains
DTN Closing Grain Comments
DTN Midday Livestock Comments
DTN Midday Grain Comments
View From the Cab
DTN Before The Bell Grain Comments
DTN Early Word Opening Livestock