AG POLICY NEWS
Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor
Thu May 23, 2013 10:25 AM CDT

Well, the sugar fight was resolved on the Senate floor Wednesday.

It was a fascinating debate, though it was also incredibly illogical.

Arguments from senators to open up the U.S. sugar market were that Americans pay $14 billion more or so for food with sugar than if the U.S. didn't have such protectionist measures for U.S. sugar growers.

Fair enough. But the Congressional Budget Office stated that scrapping a portion of the sugar protections would save taxpayers about $82 million over 10 years.

Never have I seen such a bogus budget score.

Outside of oil, perhaps no two products dominate ...

Quick View
  • The New Dicamba At an event exhibiting the company's soon-to-arrive Dicamba-tolerant soybean trait, Monsanto repr...
  • Rates Too Low Too Long Discounted interest rates have led to unintended consequences in land values, a shortage of funds...
  • Center Pivots Take a Beating Severe storms in mid-June have damaged hundreds of center pivot irrigation systems in Nebraska al...
  • "Easy Money Times Over" Feeding the world population won't be as hard as expected over the next decade some experts forec...
  • A Hunger for High-Tech The Gruhlkey brothers of Wildorado, Texas, are using technology and thoughtful cropping choices t...
  • Clearing the Air EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy told a group of agribusiness representatives that her agency want...
  • No More Outlaw Vets Veterinarians can start breathing a little easier now when they go to work, without the fear that...
  • Ask the Vet My vet diagnosed anaplaz and I've never heard of that.
Related News Stories
Washington Insider -- Tuesday
Washington Insider
Washington Insider -- Monday
Vilsack Visits Drought-Hit California
McCarthy Talks CWA
Conservation Groups Defend Water Rule
Washington Insider -- Friday
EPA's Second-in-Command Resigns
Washington Insider -- Thursday
Washington Insider -- Wednesday