Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Friday 06/27/14

Business Groups Want Quick Action on COOL

A coalition of agribusiness and manufacturing groups wrote House and Senate Agriculture Committee leaders on Thursday calling for Congress to act quickly on any World Trade Organization rule that goes against the U.S. on country of origin labeling.

According to a newsletter I receive, the WTO is sharing its decision privately with Canada, Mexico and the U.S. as early as today. The WTO, which preaches transparency in trade, apparently shares the information in a "confidential" ruling that is later unveiled.

The business groups, led by the Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers, wrote about their concern that Canada and Mexico could "subject an array of U.S. exports to retaliatory tariffs." Further, the groups wrote "A finding of non-compliance would surely result in serious economic harm to U.S. firms that export to our neighbors."

USDA revised its rule on COOL last year after the WTO found that the old meat label discriminated against Mexican and Canadian livestock producers. Canada and Mexico immediately filed complaints against the new rule once USDA drafted it. Thus, we're in the second round of WTO legal battles over this issue.

The business groups want Congress to "direct the Secretary of Agriculture to suspend indefinitely the revised COOL rule for muscle cuts of meat upon a final adjudication of non-compliance with WTO obligations."


Chris Clayton can be reached at chris.clayton@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 12:24PM CDT 06/27/14 by Chris Clayton
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
September  2015
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30         
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • FSA Reminds Farmers About Safety Net Enrollment Deadlines
  • NFU Signals Growing Farm Stress
  • EPA Analyzes Successes, Shortfalls of Three Chesapeake Bay States
  • Enviros sue EPA on WOTUS
  • USDA Unveils Sage Grouse Initiative 2.0
  • House Presses EPA on Mine Spill, WOTUS Ruling Expected
  • Inhofe Questions WOTUS Provision
  • Aggie Moms Versus Celebrity Moms Over Biotech Food Labels
  • Iowa Farm Bureau Looks at Costs of Avian Influenza
  • EPA Moment of Irony on Water Quality
  • Members of Congress Seek Action on Chinese Currency Devaluation
  • Algae Blooms and Other Unforeseeable Problems
  • USTR: Canada and Mexico Inflated Losses Due to COOL
  • Congress Still Struggling to Roll on Down the Highway
  • Ag Groups Join Call for Delay on Ozone Regs
  • Looking at Corporate Climate Initiatives and Agriculture
  • USDA Gathers Conservation Data
  • Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mirrors Iowa
  • Cover Crops use Continue Rise Nationally
  • Senate Tax Package Could Offset Some Doom and Gloom