Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Friday 06/27/14

Business Groups Want Quick Action on COOL

A coalition of agribusiness and manufacturing groups wrote House and Senate Agriculture Committee leaders on Thursday calling for Congress to act quickly on any World Trade Organization rule that goes against the U.S. on country of origin labeling.

According to a newsletter I receive, the WTO is sharing its decision privately with Canada, Mexico and the U.S. as early as today. The WTO, which preaches transparency in trade, apparently shares the information in a "confidential" ruling that is later unveiled.

The business groups, led by the Chamber of Commerce and National Association of Manufacturers, wrote about their concern that Canada and Mexico could "subject an array of U.S. exports to retaliatory tariffs." Further, the groups wrote "A finding of non-compliance would surely result in serious economic harm to U.S. firms that export to our neighbors."

USDA revised its rule on COOL last year after the WTO found that the old meat label discriminated against Mexican and Canadian livestock producers. Canada and Mexico immediately filed complaints against the new rule once USDA drafted it. Thus, we're in the second round of WTO legal battles over this issue.

The business groups want Congress to "direct the Secretary of Agriculture to suspend indefinitely the revised COOL rule for muscle cuts of meat upon a final adjudication of non-compliance with WTO obligations."


Chris Clayton can be reached at chris.clayton@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 12:24PM CDT 06/27/14 by Chris Clayton
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
November  2014
S M T W T F S
                  1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30                  
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • ARC and the PLC Reference Price
  • RFS Decision Could Alter Biofuels, Corn, Soybean Markets
  • Is Keystone XL Back to Square One?
  • Chevrolet Buys CO2 Credits from Working Ranch Grasslands
  • Sign up for ARC or PLC Next Week? Surely You Jest!
  • Top Donors to House and Senate Ag Leaders
  • Farm Groups Want Tax Extender Legislation in Lame Duck
  • Republicans Sweep Key Senate Races
  • Biotech Label Battles Continue at Ballot Box
  • Cattle Industry, Land Group Presses Feds to Pull WOTUS Rule
  • USDA Moving Ahead with Beef Checkoff Plans
  • Politicos Weigh in on USDA APH Yield Exclusion
  • Views in Congress Vary on COOL
  • Vilsack Addresses Checkoff Controversy
  • GAO: 'USDA Needs to Better Communicate Climate Plan'
  • Offering Advice on Farm Bill Choices
  • Governors, Attorneys General say CWA Rule a Legal Threat to Farmers
  • Dem Senators ask President to Leave RFS Alone
  • Senators Push for Withdraw of Endangered Species Act Rule
  • ARC and the PLC Reference Price