Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Monday 04/28/14

CAST Report Rejects Arguments to Label Biotech Foods

The Council on Agricultural Science and Technology released a report Monday questioning the value or need to label food produced with genetically-engineered crops.

The paper concludes there is no scientific reason to label foods because of biotech crops. Doing so "abandons the traditional U.S. practice of providing for consumer food preferences through voluntary product differentiation and labeling." Moreover, there are already market efforts to provide consumers with labels for products that do not use genetically-engineered crops. Mandatory labels would increase food costs and also have negative implications for trade and free speech, the CAST paper states.

The CAST paper dismisses the main argument from labeling proponents: the public's right to know what is in their food.

The analysis comes on the heels of a vote last week in the Vermont Legislature to adopt mandatory labels for foods with ingredients from biotech crops. Vermont could become the first ate to implement a biotech-labeling regimen. Connecticut and Maine also have adopted labeling laws that also could go into effect but they have caveats such as requiring border states or nearby states with a collective population of more than 20 million people to adopt similar legislation as well.

The analysis expects that state laws will likely be challenged in court regarding preemption of federal authority and possible violation of the First Amendment.

Authors of the study note that mandatory labeling would negatively affect food companies. The desire to avoid a GE or GMO label would prompt at least some food companies to switch to other non-biotech ingredients. Studies also are all over the map regarding just how much such labeling would cost.

A bill in Congress introduced earlier this month would ensure there would be no labeling of food with biotech products unless the Food and Drug Administration determines a need to label a specific food product. That bill, however, has only five congressmen signed on as sponsors.

It should be noted that CAST is largely funded by agricultural organizations and companies that oppose mandatory labeling of food from biotech crops.

The full CAST report can be read at http://dld.bz/…

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 9:45AM CDT 04/28/14 by Chris Clayton
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
December  2014
S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31         
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Vilsack Dropping Beef Checkoff Proposal
  • USDA Details on APH Exclusion
  • Agribusinesses See Benefits with More Open Cuba
  • Members of Congress Want Rule on Active Engagement
  • House Passes Appropriations with Several Ag Riders
  • Appropriations Bill Would Block New Beef Checkoff
  • Senate Pushback on WOTUS Expected Next Year
  • Groups Champion Revenue for Ag Infrastructure
  • GMO Labeling Push Continues
  • ARC and the PLC Reference Price
  • RFS Decision Could Alter Biofuels, Corn, Soybean Markets
  • Is Keystone XL Back to Square One?
  • Chevrolet Buys CO2 Credits from Working Ranch Grasslands
  • Sign up for ARC or PLC Next Week? Surely You Jest!
  • Top Donors to House and Senate Ag Leaders
  • Farm Groups Want Tax Extender Legislation in Lame Duck
  • Republicans Sweep Key Senate Races
  • Biotech Label Battles Continue at Ballot Box
  • Cattle Industry, Land Group Presses Feds to Pull WOTUS Rule
  • USDA Moving Ahead with Beef Checkoff Plans