Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Tuesday 03/04/14

Battles Over California's Egg Law Continue

When the farm bill negotiators declined to include Rep. Steve King's amendment to the legislation on interstate commerce, the body that disdains judicial activism left it to the courts and the states to battle over California's controversial rules on housing egg-laying hens.

As the New York Times reported Tuesday, hens in California have got it better than hens in other states. Also, added to that, any eggs shipped from other states and sold in California are going to have to follow California's lead and offer their hens more space or those eggs can't be sold in the state.

King, a Republican, championed his provision because he argued California and other states were passing too many laws that restricted market access and impeded interstate commerce. Moreover, the egg law in California directly affected Iowa, which produces 14.5 billion eggs, nearly double the number of eggs of any other state in the country.

Pressure from congressmen from both parties prompted the principal negotiators on the farm bill to eliminate the King provision from the final version of the farm bill passed last month.

Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster, a Democrat, now has filed a lawsuit against California over the hen standards. It's interesting Missouri has taken the lead because 14 other states produce more eggs than Missouri. Yet, Koster makes the same case as King that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution prohibits states from regulating conduct outside its borders that place undue burdens on interstate commerce.

"California has placed restrictions on the sale or transfer of a commodity based on production methods that have nothing to do with the health or safety of California consumers," said Koster in a news release announcing the litigation last month. "If California legislators are permitted to mandate the size of chicken coops on Missouri farms, they may just as easily demand that Missouri soybeans be harvested by hand or that Missouri corn be transported by solar-powered trucks."

The NYT piece cited that Arkansas, Iowa and Nebraska are considering supporting Missouri's litigation.

http://www.nytimes.com/…

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 6:59AM CST 03/04/14 by Chris Clayton
Comments (1)
Question. If producers quit shipping eggs from these coops, would not the egg eaters of California solve the problem?
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 6:09AM CST 03/07/14
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
January  2015
S M T W T F S
            1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • FSA Head Making the Rounds on Farm Program Enrollment
  • Capturing the Drama of Farmland Transfers
  • Iowa Seeks to Ramp Up Politics of Ethanol
  • White House Tax Plan Targets Capital Gains, Stepped Up Basis
  • Corn Ethanol Target of Keystone Amendment
  • Ag Responds to House Immigration Vote
  • No Easy Fix for COOL
  • Trade Talk at AFBF Annual Meeting
  • A New Stream of Clean Water Act Litigation in Iowa
  • Dietary Guidelines and Defining Lean Meat
  • Obama Keystone Veto Threat Lauded by Enviros Ahead of Votes
  • Keystone, Keystone and More Keystone
  • GOP Seeks Elusive Balance on Immigration Reform in 2015
  • Looking Ahead to 2015
  • Vilsack Dropping Beef Checkoff Proposal
  • USDA Details on APH Exclusion
  • Agribusinesses See Benefits with More Open Cuba
  • Members of Congress Want Rule on Active Engagement
  • House Passes Appropriations with Several Ag Riders
  • Appropriations Bill Would Block New Beef Checkoff