Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Friday 01/17/14

USDA Reviewing COOL Language in Spending Bill

A USDA spokesperson told DTN Friday that the department is reviewing the appropriations' language on country-of-origin labeling in the 2014 omnibus spending bill this week, but no decisions have been made on whether USDA should change course.

“USDA is in the process of reviewing the explanatory statement that was attached to the appropriations bill. The final rule that modified the labeling provisions for muscle cut meat commodities covered under Country of Origin Labeling went into effect on May 23, 2013. During the six month period following the effective date of the regulation, USDA has conducted an industry education and outreach program concerning the provisions and requirements of this rule. USDA continues to assist retailers and suppliers with complying with the rule," the spokesperson said in an email to DTN.

The explanatory language came from a joint agreement by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The text states that the agreement reached in Congress does not approve of USDA's continued implementation, enforcement and spending on mandatory country-of-origin labeling regulations. Appropriators noted the potentially high cost of implementing USDA's new rule, which has a range of $53.1 million to $192.1 million at the high end. Lawmakers noted Canada and Mexico still are not satisfied. Canada has responded by suggesting possible retaliatory tariffs of $1.1 billion. "Mexico is expected to issue a similar list of U.S. exports totaling several hundred million dollars."

"It is strongly recommended that USDA not force increased costs on industry and consumer and that the department delay enforcement of the final rule ... until the WTO has completed all decisions related to cases," lawmakers wrote.

Thus far, it's unclear whether the farm bill conferees will take a vote on how to treat country-of-origin labels

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 3:06PM CST 01/17/14 by Chris Clayton
Comments (2)
For the most part, if there is not a means to identify origination of anything I purchase, food or other, I walk on by. With the food cost in this country at about 5% of household income, where's the beef?
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:47AM CST 01/18/14
Is this another big business perk
Posted by Steve Alexander at 8:38AM CST 01/22/14
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
September  2014
S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30            
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • EPA Water Rule Starts in the Ephemeral Streams
  • Looking at Base Acre Decisions Facing Farmers
  • Report: U.S. Lost WTO Ruling
  • NFU Leaders Want to Walk Away from Beef Talks
  • RMA Readying Details on Spring Crops and SCO
  • USDA Readies STAX for 2015
  • 2014 Corn Crop Could Gut Farm Bill Savings
  • House Ag Leaders Push Vilsack on Grain Inspectors
  • Roberts Wins in Kansas; Right to Farm Appears to Win in Missouri
  • Conservation Program, Cover-Crop Research Advance
  • Farmers Urged to Give Lawmakers Earful on CWA, Immigration
  • USDA Releases Greenhouse Gas Report
  • USDA Says SCO Insurance is Ready for 2015 Crops
  • U.S. Sugar Growers Make Case Against Mexican Imports
  • CoBank to Lead New Rural Investment Fund
  • USDA Names Research Foundation Board Members
  • Life is a Highway Full of Bumps and Detours
  • AFBF not Impressed by EPA Reaction to Ag Concerns
  • Bumper Crop 2014 Crop Would Put ARC in Spotlight
  • House Continues to Wrestle with Waters of the United States