Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Monday 12/30/13

USDA Still Looking for Comments on Biotech Coexistence

USDA is still struggling to find some common ground on biotech and non-biotech coexistence.

Last week, the department posted a notice in the Federal Register extending the comment period on ways people can work together to avoid conflicts between growers of biotech and non-biotech crops. In USDA parlance, the department wants information "on ways to foster communication and collaboration among those involved in diverse agricultural production systems in order to further agricultural coexistence."

USDA originally posted its request Nov. 4 in the Federal Register with a comment period ending Jan. 3. As of now, the department has received only 59 comments on the coexistence conversation. Most of the comments regard ways to ban biotech crops altogether or or set up "GMO free zones." The University of California-Davis Cooperative Extension office submitted some information from a series of articles the extension did on biotech crop processes. There was little actual commentary on what USDA was most interested, "effective coexistence practices" between farmers for mitigating the economic risks of co-mingled pollination.

You may recall that USDA formed a committee on the issue of biotechnology and coexistence known as AC21 that examined issues such as compensation for contamination, voluntary practices, outreach and research.

Thus, USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service posted a new notice last week in the Federal Register seeking to extend the comment period until March 4. USDA plans to eventually hold a public forum on the topic after the comment period ends.

More information about USDA's interest in coexistence strategies can be found through the original Federal Register posting. The docket folder also leads to comments already posted on the issue. http://www.regulations.gov/…

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN.

Posted at 3:28PM CST 12/30/13 by Chris Clayton
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
March  2015
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31            
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Ag Groups Ask GOP Candidates to Check Out Green Power
  • Iowa Political Event Puts Spotlight on Ag Policy
  • ASA Seeks to Change Dialogue on GMO Labeling Debate
  • Farmers and Battles Over State Taxes
  • Former Congressman Looks at Ag Policy Challenges Ahead
  • One More ARC-PLC Analysis as Base Acre Deadline Looms
  • Ag Contracts Transitioning to Ag Consolidation
  • Tentative Deal Reached in West Coast Ports Labor Dispute
  • Senator Turns Crop Insurance into a Pork Parody
  • All About That Base
  • Dueling Biotech Labeling Efforts in Congress
  • Crop Insurance Cuts and the Chronic Budget Problem
  • Great, Another COOL Blog
  • Ag Groups Seek to Avoid Cuts in Crop Insurance
  • Senators Renew Effort to Cap Crop Insurance Premium Subsidies
  • Congressman Presses EPA on maps Leading to CWA Hearing
  • The Conflicting Signals Around Agriculture and Climate Change
  • FSA Head Making the Rounds on Farm Program Enrollment
  • Capturing the Drama of Farmland Transfers
  • Iowa Seeks to Ramp Up Politics of Ethanol