Ag Policy Blog
Jerry Hagstrom DTN Political Correspondent

Thursday 12/12/13

Farm Bill Close to a Deal

House and Senate Agriculture committee leaders said today that they expect both chambers of Congress to pass a new farm bill in early January, but lawmakers will not reveal details on the agreement until then.

Ideally, the farm-bill conferees will be bringing a deal to the floor soon after 2014 begins.

The House has gone out of session after passing a one-month extension of the 2008 farm bill. The Senate will be in session through Dec. 20, but is not expected to take up the extension bill. House leaders said they wanted to make sure USDA does not implement the 1949 dairy law, which would lead to higher milk prices. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has said that is not a worry if Congress passes a new farm bill in January.

The principal negotiators include House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., House Agriculture ranking member Collin Peterson, D-Minn., Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and Senate Agriculture ranking member Thad Cochran, R-Miss., Lucas said the group had "another productive meeting" on Friday. Lucas, who is chairing the conference, talked with reporters as they emerged from a meeting room in the Longworth House Office Building.

"We're moving right down the pike," Lucas said, adding that the bill now needs to be vetted by the House and Senate Agriculture committee lawyers.

Stabenow said there is "no question" about whether the committees will come to an agreement to pass a bill in early January, but she also said that they would not release a framework agreement until early January because so the other 37 conferees on the farm bill would have a chance to look at the agreement. Stabenow said it will be a "courtesy to our fellow conferees" to present it to them before releasing it to the public.

There have been reports that Lucas and Peterson will return to Washington to negotiate with Stabenow and Cochran. Lucas affirmed that they would return if needed, but Stabenow said they would consult either in person or by telephone.

Lucas told K-101 Radio, a Woodward, Okla., station on Thursday that the lawmakers have reached agreement on the commodity title, crop insurance and the nutrition title including food stamps. When asked if the group had moved on to other issues, Lucas quoted Stabenow, who has said, "It's not done until it's all done."

All four principal negotiators have declined to reveal details of the bill, but some information on the agreement has leaked out. It appears the bill would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by $8 billion over 10 years, twice want the Senate wanted but only a fifth of what the House approved.

On the commodity title, it appears farmers will have a choice between payments based on revenue losses and one based on target prices. Payments would be made on base acreages, but it appears likely farmers will be able to update their bases to reflect changes in what they grow compared with the 1980s when the current bases were established. It seems likely that participants in the subsidized crop insurance program will have to comply with federal conservation standards, but less likely that premium subsidies to high income farmers will be cut.

Peterson has said that the dairy program will be "workable," an indication that he is satisfied with it and that it will favor dairy farmers more than processors.

Both the House and Senate farm bills extended the current sugar program, and it appears likely to remain in the bill even though low prices have led to government payments for the first time in a decade and sugar users have complained it is raising their costs.

Politico reported on Dec. 13 that the conference leaders had settled on limiting the land-idling Conservation Reserve Program to 24 million acres.

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN.

Posted at 10:31AM CST 12/12/13 by Jerry Hagstrom
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
October  2014
S M T W T F S
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31   
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Politicos Weigh in on USDA APH Yield Exclusion
  • Views in Congress Vary on COOL
  • Vilsack Addresses Checkoff Controversy
  • GAO: 'USDA Needs to Better Communicate Climate Plan'
  • Offering Advice on Farm Bill Choices
  • Governors, Attorneys General say CWA Rule a Legal Threat to Farmers
  • Dem Senators ask President to Leave RFS Alone
  • Senators Push for Withdraw of Endangered Species Act Rule
  • ARC and the PLC Reference Price
  • Beef Promotion Leads to Beef Politics
  • Small Business Advocacy Group Calls for CWA Rule to be Withdrawn
  • CRP, Base Acres and Proof for Yield Updates
  • Business Groups: Withdraw WOTUS Rule
  • Photo Fees on Public Lands? C'Mon, Man!
  • USDA ARC-PLC Rollout and Decision Tools for Farmers
  • Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
  • Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
  • Senate Committee Passes Railroad Regulatory Bill
  • U.S. Shanghaied in Smithfield Deal?
  • Route 66: The End of the Trail