Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Thursday 12/05/13

Farm Bill Looking Less Likely

The people debating whether to push work requirements for able-bodied food stamp recipients are having trouble getting their work done before the end of the year.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters in Washington the House is ready to give farm-bill negotiators may require another short-term extension into January. House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., indicated on AgriTalk earlier in the week that negotiations may have to carry into January.

USDA and the White House communications staff issued a statement late Thursday afternoon from USDA Communications Director Matt Paul.

"Negotiations on Capitol Hill about the Farm Bill should continue until House and Senate leaders reach agreement on a comprehensive bill. Numerous members of both sides have indicated progress, and the country deserves continued work on this critical legislation."

Push for Payment Caps

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, continued to make his case for a tighter payment cap and more specific requirements for being considered as actively engaged in farming. Grassley makes the case in an editorial published in POLITICO.

"Years ago, when Congress joined farm and nutrition policy into one piece of legislation, it meant that the legislative leaders in agriculture would be, almost by default, leaders in nutrition policy. People might thus believe there should be some parallels between the structures of the two programs, as both in theory provide a limited amount of support in times of need," he wrote.

"However, in this farm bill conference, it seems some members want to reduce food stamps while reopening loopholes for multi-million-dollar farming entities. There’s bipartisan agreement that the food-stamp program needs reform, but how can we save money in one program and at the same time turn a blind eye to the loopholes that millionaires exploit?"

Read more:…

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 7:56PM CST 12/05/13 by Chris Clayton
Comments (8)
The farm programs have turned into a cash cow instead of a safety net.We should have to show a loss or no gain to be eligable for any farm payments.If you can't farm in this day in age without aid your in trouble before you even get started.Good farmers can farm on their own.
Posted by Raymond Simpkins at 7:15AM CST 12/10/13
Maybe we should have the same requirements for the "able-bodied food stamp recipients" for the farmers? or for both we should bring out a bathroom scales and weigh them,,,, how many farmers would get aid then?????
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 9:19AM CST 12/10/13
Since both of you are dead against farm subsidies, why don't you give back the cash cow dollars that you have received over the past years and help out the national debt a little bit. I bet that if you walk into the FSA office and tell them that you would like to re-pay all of that money, they would figure out where to send it. Just a thought. After all, good farmers don't need it.
Posted by Mr. Brandy at 12:00PM CST 12/10/13
There is no point in giving any money back. Obama and the liberals in congress have an endless supply of money to give out. See
Posted by Sally Benson at 12:36PM CST 12/10/13
Mr Brandy I could do it, but it would just end up going to someone like you.And i'll say it again good smart farmers don't need it.
Posted by Raymond Simpkins at 2:55PM CST 12/10/13
I guess you really howled when Reagan tripled the debt and when Bush took Clintons surplus and ran up a debt Sally??? How do you "fiscal conservatives" justify $800 billion for the war in Iraq??? What did we get in return for that one?
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 6:22AM CST 12/13/13
Jay, take the excess payments into the general fund of SS and remove the moving of future retirement payments of fed workers to pay for current expenses and your Clinton surpluses disappear. And what has main street gotten out of the 935 billion pumped into the bond market by Obama this year alone. With so many touting how worthless Regans trickle down theory was, exactly what is pumping a trillion a year into Wall Street really doing? Come on, city and state, big boy.
Posted by CRAIG MOORE at 9:48AM CST 12/16/13
You forgot Jay how liberals and democrats refused to cut insane government spending as Reagan wanted.
Posted by W Kuster at 2:20PM CST 12/17/13
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
April  2014
      1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30         
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Vilsack: I Don't Have Presidential Sizzle
  • Proposed Rule on Waters of the U.S. Flows into Federal Register
  • Landowner Effects Expected from Lesser Prairie Chicken Listing
  • Senators Concerned Plan to Reduce Methane Emissions Will Hurt Ag
  • SNAP Program Sees Change in CBO Estimates
  • Everyone is Lobbying on the RFS
  • The IPCC on Biofuels: Good or Bad?
  • Senators See No Place for Geographical Indicators
  • Senate Finance Committee Approves Tax Extenders Package
  • Farm Bureau Opposes EPA Waters Rule
  • In Search of Immigration Reform in the House
  • Lesser Prairie Chicken Decision Ruffles Feathers
  • Senators Concerned About Possible FSA Office Closures
  • Tax Extenders Remain in Limbo
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Targets Conservation in Prairie Pothole Region
  • California, Ethanol and Eggs
  • USDA Highlights Organic Programs in Farm Bill
  • ARC, PLC, SCO and NCAA Tourney Picks
  • Carbon Offset Program Announced for Rice Growers
  • FAPRI Projects Billions More in PLC Payments Than CBO Numbers