Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Thursday 11/07/13

EWG Data: Billionaires No Longer Reap Millions in Farm Subsidies

I don't think millionaires or billionaires should get federal subsidies. I suspect that opinion is shared by a high percentage of Americans. If we're cutting services and aid at the bottom, we should be hacking subsidies at the top.

But you can't repackage old information and serve it up as something new. I understand the desire to do so, especially when you have spent a ton of time compiling the information. Maybe you feel the need to get your point across or make yourself relevant one more time. New information be damned.

All that said, Environmental Working Group put out data on Thursday headlined "Forbes Billionaires Reaped Millions in Farm Subsidies." Wow, that's interesting. It was a big deal to some, including the New York Times, which went right off the EWG data and turned an article out of it.

"The federal government paid $11.3 million in taxpayer-funded farm subsidies from 1995 to 212 to 50 billionaires or businesses ... " the Times' lead declares.

Yes, the essence of what EWG stated was true. The NGO of farm payments just forgot to mention that the vast majority of this fleecing of federal taxpayers happened at least a decade ago. This new report is a rehash of older information. A couple of years stick out: 2003, the year after a new farm bill was signed, and 2008, the year the last farm bill was signed. In one of those two years, almost all of the payments to billionaires stopped.

In fact, since 2008, only two or three of the farms owned by billionaires had received any farm payments at all. I scanned through the list of 50 billionaire farms provided by EWG and found two farms that collectively received $185,000 total. Thus, since the last farm bill was passed, 48 of those farms owned by billionaires had not received anything.

Now, clearly someone slipped through the cracks on the $185,000, but that's not $11 million. The lion's share of that $11 million goes back to the 1990s when the federal government operated more like an ATM machine.

If I would have had more time, I could have totaled up the information since 2003, but I realized I had already spent too much time and energy on a non-story. That was the case until I got a press release from a handful of farm-bill reformers in the House who denounced the payments. It's embarrassing because the reformers should have been pointing out how these payments to billionaires virtually stopped because of earlier efforts they championed in farm bills.

Instead, they went for moral outrage:

"Outrageous Farm Payments to Billionaires Highlights Urgent Need to Reform Ag Policy."

"WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI), U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), U.S. Rep. Tom Petri (R-WI) and U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) continued to call for major reforms to current farm subsidy policy in the wake of a report released today that details a long list of billionaires who are profiting from taxpayer-funded farm subsidies.

"The report, released by the research and advocacy organization Environmental Working Group (EWG), found that the federal government paid $11.3 million in taxpayer-funded subsidies to 50 billionaires (or businesses in which they have an ownership stake) between 1995 and 2012. EWG compiled the list by matching their Farm Subsidy Database with the Forbes 400 list of the richest Americans. According to the list, the billionaires who received these farm subsidies have a collective net worth estimated to be $316 billion."

Seriously?

Follow me on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 5:06PM CST 11/07/13 by Chris Clayton
Comments (7)
There may be only a few billionaires getting millions in crop insurance subsidies , but obviously there are still nearly countless millionaires getting millions if not billions in crop insurance subsidies. The schemes and scams have morphed from direct payments to crop insurance subsidies. You are dreaming Chris if you think congress has discontinued awarding the largest financial enhancements to largest and wealthiest farmers.
Posted by Sally Benson at 7:52PM CST 11/07/13
Ms. Benson, Where is the data to support your claims?
Posted by Paul A. Harrison at 6:28AM CST 11/08/13
Thanks for the facts, Chris. Sure hope a voter from their Districts relay this info to their Reps. This is a perfect example of how reliable the information from EWG, and other self appointed earth and nation saviors is.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 6:59AM CST 11/08/13
http://www.taxpayer.net/user_uploads/file/CRSReports/2010/12_13_2010_CRSFedCropInsurance.pdf and http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/agriculture/subsidies and http://www4.ncsu.edu/~bkgoodwi/papers/goodwin_final.pdf and http://www.fapri.missouri.edu/outreach/publications/2010/FAPRI_MU_Report_10_10.pdf and http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-256 The data is easy to see for those who choose not to be blind.
Posted by Sally Benson at 7:34AM CST 11/08/13
This still is the USA where being in business (big or small) is about making a profit and growing. As farmers you should not be fighting about the size of the farmer but focus on EWG and other groups that are against anyone, including farmers making a profit that they don't share with everyone. Congress does not have the fix for anything currently, since they have zero concept on stopping our over spending on everything. Stop fighting other farmers, put your energy toward the non-farming public that does not understand agriculture.
Posted by John Finley at 8:47AM CST 11/08/13
Nice article Chris. Thanks.
Posted by Jarrod Bennett at 1:14PM CST 11/08/13
Congress does not have the fix for anything currently, since they have zero concept on stopping our over spending on everything. Posted by John Finley at 8:47AM CST 11/08/13 If congress does not have a clue about what they are doing why would we want to continue on that path. Why would we want to pass bills so we can find out what is in them?
Posted by Sally Benson at 7:15AM CST 11/09/13
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
April  2014
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30         
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Vermont Lawmakers Pass Biotech Labeling Legislation
  • Senators Seek Funding for PEDv Vaccine
  • Vilsack: I Don't Have Presidential Sizzle
  • Proposed Rule on Waters of the U.S. Flows into Federal Register
  • Landowner Effects Expected from Lesser Prairie Chicken Listing
  • Senators Concerned Plan to Reduce Methane Emissions Will Hurt Ag
  • SNAP Program Sees Change in CBO Estimates
  • Everyone is Lobbying on the RFS
  • The IPCC on Biofuels: Good or Bad?
  • Senators See No Place for Geographical Indicators
  • Senate Finance Committee Approves Tax Extenders Package
  • Farm Bureau Opposes EPA Waters Rule
  • In Search of Immigration Reform in the House
  • Lesser Prairie Chicken Decision Ruffles Feathers
  • Senators Concerned About Possible FSA Office Closures
  • Tax Extenders Remain in Limbo
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Targets Conservation in Prairie Pothole Region
  • California, Ethanol and Eggs
  • USDA Highlights Organic Programs in Farm Bill
  • ARC, PLC, SCO and NCAA Tourney Picks