Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Thursday 09/13/12

GOP Senator: Obama is Anti-Agriculture

Democratic President Barack Obama has supported rural America as farmers achieved record income over the past four years or is "anti-agriculture" and helped induce an unprecedented regulatory burden on rural America.

Republican Mitt Romney will either wreck the rural economy and cut meaningful rural programs or unleash greater prosperity by stopping new regulations on farmers and businesses while more aggressively championing free trade deals.

Those were the stark contrasts for farmers as surrogates for both campaigns debated positions on agricultural and rural issues on Wednesday before a group largely made up of members of the National Association of State Directors of Agriculture.

Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., a former U.S. Agriculture Secretary under the last Bush administration, debated former Iowa Lt. Gov. Patty Judge, a Democrat who also served eight years as Iowa's agriculture secretary.

The debate comes as farm groups also lobbied Wednesday in Washington to push lawmakers to adopt a new five-year farm bill, though House leaders seem intent on delaying any floor debate on the farm bill until after the presidential election.

In advocating for Obama, Judge cited the overall strength of the rural economy over the past four years and a $45 billion trade surplus in 2011 --- actually $42.9 billion. Judge was critical of Romney for not supporting the wind energy production tax credit that could expire at the end of the year. She also said Obama has been fighting to get a five-year farm bill passed while Romney has supported his running mate Paul Ryan's proposal, which calls for steeper cuts than the Senate or House versions of the farm bill.

Judge said Republican leaders in the House, including Ryan, continue to block the farm bill by declining to bring to the floor for a debate. She added Ryan's budget plan also cut rural economic programs and tries to ask rural America to shoulder a disproportionate share of program cuts.

"In fact, if the Romney-Ryan budget were implemented across the federal budget as proposed, hundreds of thousands of rural families would go without investments to support clean water and rural communities would be denied investments in facilities such as hospitals," Judge said.

She added, "Romney would put the rural economy at risk."

Johanns set a tone by commenting on Obama, "I don't use this term lightly but he has been anti-agriculture."

Johanns then cited agriculture's regulatory battles with Obama over the past few years, ranging from particulate matter, or farm dust -- though no regulatory change was ever actually proposed -- to the administration's support of the estate tax, the failed climate change legislation and the healthcare law, which initially included a provision requiring businesses to issue 1099 forms for all sales over $600. Johanns also cited complaints about EPA flyovers of livestock operations, noting every member of the Nebraska congressional delegation wrote Jackson asking for an explanation. "To this day, Lisa Jackson has refused to answer that letter."

Later on, Johanns suggested the White House Office of Management and Budget is sitting on more potential regulations waiting until the election is over to release them.

Judge dismissed Johanns on that point while clarifying there are no drones out there checking on farmers and EPA flyovers of farms actually began under the Bush administration. "I don't believe they (Obama officials) are sitting out there with a fistful of regulations just waiting for the election."

On the farm bill, Johanns said both the House and Senate have made cuts and differences will be worked out once negotiations begin on a conference report. Still, that won't come quickly, he said. "The key element is to get it right and recognize we are going to have to cut some spending."

The senator also repeatedly noted during the debate that Romney favors eliminating the estate tax. Obama has supported returning to a $3.5 million exemption with a 45% tax rate. Currently, the exemption is $5 million and the rate is 35%, but those provisions expire at the end of the year.

Despite signing the Colombia, Panama and South Korean free-trade agreements, Johanns said trade also has been a weak spot for Obama. He hasn't reached deals on any new trade agreements and hasn't asked Congress for trade promotion authority, but Romney would. Johanns said he wouldn't expect any further FTAs from the Obama administration. "They aren't a pro-trade group."

I can be found on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN

Posted at 6:15AM CDT 09/13/12 by Chris Clayton
Comments (7)
Again...either flavor of Candidates, from the POTUS down, if you're talking GOP, Dems, or more and more, even Tea Partyers, you're getting folks proven to be highly co-opted by monied interests. Who wins then? Wall Street, the associated bank cartel known as the Fed, Big Agra, Big Pharma, Big Oil and Industry. So then, want to guess who DOESN'T win...again?
Posted by Ric Ohge at 9:47AM CDT 09/13/12
When corn is selling for $7.65 & soybeans $17.56 per bushel is very difficult to call Obama anti-agriculture. Ronald Reagan was the "father" of anti-agriculture.
Posted by W Lee Deutsche at 1:30PM CDT 09/13/12
Lee, The price of today is do to short supply, strong demand. The future of the freedom to farm may well be, anti agriculture. This will be the norm untill Walmarts shelves are bare.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 8:37PM CDT 09/13/12
Yeah and Bush left office with an 8000 Dow, banks collapsing, double digit unemployment and Rush/ Hanedy crowd says things were better 4 years ago ,,, dream on! This was the best year for my farm,, nothing like it in Reagan's time!
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 8:10PM CDT 09/16/12
Empty chair syndrome?
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 8:58PM CDT 09/16/12
Close, Bonnie...the boat is steaming full speed ahead, but Captain's out cold on the wheelhouse floor.
Posted by Ric Ohge at 10:03AM CDT 09/17/12
From Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb. speech I've got that there is a useful for farmers bill but Obama can't push it thought congress because elected republicans rejected it due to Obama inability make a deal and therefore farmers should vote for Romney to get the bill passed. Sounds like blackmail to me and seems that elected republicans don't care for farmer needs but politics. Hopefully farmers more intelligent then Mike Johanns thinks of them by considering vote for Obama with replacement of republican congress back to democratic under consideration that this is another way to get Bill passed. The question only who we trust more and Obama feels more real.
Posted by Peter Petros at 10:13PM CDT 09/21/12
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
February  2016
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29               
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • President Obama Gears up for a Final Budget to Nowhere
  • AFBF Poll: 'Chesapeake Landowners Want Local Control'
  • On Cottonseed, Oilseed and What the Farm Bill Says
  • Cruz, Clinton Win Iowa Caucuses
  • Cruz Wins Iowa GOP Caucus
  • Cottonseed Farm Program Could Be Costly
  • Ag Action in the Iowa Caucuses
  • Senators Push for DOJ Investigation on WOTUS Rule
  • Public Transparency is Increasingly Critical for Food and Agriculture
  • GOP Candidates Touch on Ag, Farm Issues in Debate
  • Ag Groups React to SOTU on Trade, Climate
  • Vilsack Talks About Cotton, Biotech Labels
  • Keystone XL Lawsuits Further Complicate TPP Politics
  • In Defense of New Dietary Guidelines
  • A Cruz Conversion on the RFS?
  • TPP Unlikely to Be Approved Before End of Obama's Term
  • DTN's Annual 2016 Policy Outlook
  • 2017 Now Target for Broader Tax Relief
  • A Long COOL Ride is Ending
  • USDA Finalizes Actively Engaged Rules