Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton DTN Ag Policy Editor

Wednesday 10/01/14

CRP, Base Acres and Proof for Yield Updates
We've had a couple of questions that make me go "Hmmm" over the last few days on farm bill programs, particularly when it comes to base acre reallocation and yield update. I thought I would share what I found out.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 5:06PM CDT 10/01/14 by Chris Clayton | 0 Comments | Post a Comment

Tuesday 09/30/14

Business Groups: Withdraw WOTUS Rule
A coalition of 63 business groups representing everything from farm organizations to oil and natural gas groups, as well as homebuilders, mining, manufacturing and even golf-course trade groups all joined to write federal regulators on Monday again asking them to withdraw the proposed rule redefining waters of the United States.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 4:35PM CDT 09/30/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (2)
So more than just Farm Bureau is of the opinion that; ambiguity is not the solution to pollution.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:13AM CDT 10/01/14
However, the "coalition" letter is accessed from the Farm Bureau website. So do we just ignore this issue since it is the EPA and Army Corps suggesting resolve? It is the government after all, ag's "sugar daddy", especially in the down years. Is the current American philosophy, problems, even those man made, are best ignored, not contained, because it is inconvenient to not pollute?
Posted by Don Thompson at 7:06AM CDT 10/01/14

Monday 09/29/14

Base Acre and ARC-PLC Deadlines Reported
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has provided some dates specific to updating base acres and signing up for ARC or PLC.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 11:23AM CDT 09/29/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (1)
How is the landowner going to update yields when they have no idea of yield history data?Are we going to ues crop insurance yields?
Posted by Raymond Simpkins at 7:45PM CDT 09/29/14

Thursday 09/25/14

Photo Fees on Public Lands? C'Mon, Man!
Social media has been abuzz the past couple of days over a proposed rule by the U.S. Forest Service that would require journalists to get permits if they want to shoot photos or record videos on national forests or grasslands.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 8:42PM CDT 09/25/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (6)
Looks like the same trend us farmers have been facing. Agencies passing law which they don't have authority to do than after they enact the regulation(law) they ask us what we think. I thought in America proposed regulation or laws are supposed to go through a public scrutiny and congressional approval before that happens. Maybe we shouldn't be so hard on Russia because we are becoming more like the former USSR all the time.
Posted by Unknown at 10:32PM CDT 09/25/14
Actually it seems that these permits are being used to keep people from filming ecological misuses of Federal Land such as Utah tar sand extraction. Another point is that its a way for the public lands to be self sufficient in income rather then dependent on tax payers money,,,,, both of these points benefit the conservative view of land usage.
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 8:25AM CDT 09/26/14
Do the Environmental Journalists have an opinion of WOTUS? I would bet it is opposite this one.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:38AM CDT 09/27/14
No, the Forest Service is Not Planning to Charge You $1500 to Photograph the Wilderness
Posted by Jennifer Blackburn at 7:57AM CDT 09/29/14
I farm and I am a professional photographer. I think I understand what the service is trying to accomplish. There are so many cable companies and others such as Fox that claim to be news and journalist organizations but are actually only licensed as entertainment companies, not networks in the public interest. When these companies use the public lands for profit, that is against the law according to the original act. It should also be noted that many private companies want these lands opened up for drilling and fracking. They sometimes use photography as a means to gain access and survey. I can understand the service using this as a way of simply having an idea of who is there and why. Your comment about begging forgiveness rather than get permission upsets me greatly. I operate a 200 acre private nature preserve as part of my farms conservation plan. If I caught you there with out permission you would be charged with trespass, no amount of begging will help. You would not believe how many times I have been threatened and lied to by people caught there. And with conceal carry, there is nothing more unsettling than to confront someone on your own land that holds his hand over his holster and says "you don't want to press that 911 key on that phone". As to the comment on another post about regulation with out public scrutiny, that is why there is a public comment period for this and the WOTUS regulations.
Posted by Unknown at 8:11AM CDT 09/29/14
Why was the farm bills comment period less than 30 days?
Posted by Unknown at 11:53AM CDT 10/01/14

Tuesday 09/23/14

USDA ARC-PLC Rollout and Decision Tools for Farmers
The Agriculture Secretary will be announcing sign up dates for the programs, but more likely he will be announcing details about program rules for ARC and PLC. Along with Vilsack's announcement come computer decision tools from Texas A&M and the University of Illinois to help farmers choose between commodity programs.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 3:23PM CDT 09/23/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (2)
Sure hope the roll out is a bit more smooth than the Obamacare belly flop.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 10:12AM CDT 09/24/14
The ARCPLC regulation will be on display tomorrow, September 25 at the Federal Register. It is scheduled to publish Friday, September 26.
Posted by G. Sean O'neill at 9:50PM CDT 09/24/14

Friday 09/19/14

Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
On Wednesday, the Farm Foundation hosted a forum at the National Press Club over some of the complex issues involved in the proposed rule regarding waters of the United States by EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 1:58PM CDT 09/19/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (1)
Glad to see someone counter the grandstanding environmentalists who point at Iowa's 2013 spike in river nitrates by what I would call a perfect storm of weather phenomenon. I would also note that it takes little gray matter to parrot the word 'regulation', but much more wisdom to figure out practical ways to deal with nutrient and sediment pollution across a nearly infinite range of circumstances. That wisdom isn't likely to be found in D. C.!! I'd be anxious to learn how EPA or NRCS would deal with tile effluence when the tile system crosses multiple properties with multiple cropping, soils and fertilizer programs and the footage of tile for each landowner is unknown. Would the EPA simply fine the landowner with the tile outlet? Have they even considered this complexity or is the word 'regulation' somehow magical?
Posted by Curt Zingula at 7:25AM CDT 09/21/14

Wednesday 09/17/14

Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
On Wednesday, the Farm Foundation hosted a forum at the National Press Club over some of the complex issues involved in the proposed rule regarding waters of the United States by EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 11:02PM CDT 09/17/14 by Chris Clayton | 0 Comments | Post a Comment
Senate Committee Passes Railroad Regulatory Bill
The Senate Commerce Committee took some action Wednesday to give more authority to the Surface Transportation Board to react to railroad delays that have plagued the upper Plains.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 11:02PM CDT 09/17/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (11)
Just what is needed: The government expediting the R.R.s. How about the government expediting a couple of pipeline construction projects? Build all the railcars and tracks you want, there will still be congestion. One accident on a freeway and everything stops.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:35AM CDT 09/18/14
I hope we don't go down a path of re-regulating the railroads. Why do we expect the railroads to have anticipated two record crop years in a row plus bountiful new oil production and then build infrastructure so they could handle the surge in volume? Turning the question around on the agriculture industry, why didn't farmers and grain merchants realize the potential for this to happen five years ago and build enough storage to handle the surge? The only way to make sure new capacity of either storage or transportation will be built is to allow the markets to work. Either transportation rates have to go up enough to entice the creation of new capacity, or basis has to move to a level that entices farmers and grain merchants to increase storage. I realize this doesn't do much to help the immediate situation, but re-regulating the railroads won't help in the short or long term. We have forgotten what happened in the 70's when regulation stifled investment.
Posted by David Kessler at 9:29AM CDT 09/18/14
Who knew they would ever grow crops in North and South Dakota.Buy more trucks I guess.
Posted by Raymond Simpkins at 9:50AM CDT 09/18/14
There is plenty of storage in North and South Dakota. Many farmers have enough storage for At Least a full years production, if not more. Plus many are building an extra 80,000+ bushels of storage this year. I find it a little naive to blame this on merchants and farmers when almost any geographical area would have a hard time storing two years worth of production. Basis levels are already $-0.90 to $-0.99 for corn and harvest hasn't even started.
Posted by SD Farmer at 11:14PM CDT 09/18/14
FSA's facility loan program was developed and enacted to even out the transportation problem years ago. Problem is, the Eviro's have all but halted transportation expansion capabilities of commodities and minerals.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:58AM CDT 09/19/14
Bonnie, Please cite evidence for your claims. I fear you are making things up again,
Posted by Don Thompson at 6:52AM CDT 09/19/14
Hey Don, I don't think Bonnie is making it up, you need to listen to Rush Limbo and the other hate radio hosts to understand that they just blame every negative thing on the president and open minded thinkers. If you listen to them you will also understand that your solar installation won't work, better you stick with dirty old coal and oil so the Koch brothers make some more billions. If they aren't raking in trillions Walmart and McDonalds won't be able to pay their help $7/hr and the economy will collapse! I hope you think of that when your solar panels are producing years of free kilowatts and you better feel guilt and remorse for your part in promoting socialism. Electric companies in my state are trying to limit the amount solar producers are paid for, that any extra you produce belongs to them to sell, pure capitalism right? Anyhow our decaying infrastructure is our own fault and the amount we pay to defend Mideast oil interests way outweigh what we put into infrastructure. Wait,,, didn't Obama want to invest stimulus money in infrastructure and the Congress shoot it down???? No to infrastructure but yes to any war against any country for any reason.
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 7:29AM CDT 09/19/14
Once again Jay is out stereotyping, something he hates when people do it against his idea of a dream world. And remember that the majority of Obamas stimulus money was channeled into enhancing government employees and more was sent to universities than went into re-building the infrastructure. You can be mad at congress for not doing the right thing but didn't the Democrats hold both the House and Senate when the stimulus money was being doled out?
Posted by CRAIG MOORE at 8:30AM CDT 09/19/14
The irony in this, who was it that repeatedly blocked the keystone pipeline? Now the oil is being moved by trucks and railroads instead of the more efficient, more environmentally friendly and safer method of a pipeline. Pretty obvious who to blame for this one.
Posted by Jason Billenstein at 9:13AM CDT 09/19/14
Try USDA's website, Don, along with public comment period several years ago. Try newspaper archives, union news,etc. History is very educational if one can read without a predetermined , uneducated, biased opinion. Rep. Collin Peterson was a major player and author of the legislation. Even at that time the infrastructure of the nation was very inadequate. The development of the unit grain trains was one positive result in that timeframe. Take a look, the river system is running neck and neck with the R.R. for failure. Unless you make your boat out of birch bark and chew your skins to make leather, you are part of the problem.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 9:30AM CDT 09/19/14
The FSA has a program with a low interest loan (2.5%) for seven years to build grain storage and handling facilities. I always find it interesting that those who scream for free thinking and tolerance, seem to be the least tolerant of all.
Posted by SD Farmer at 11:00AM CDT 09/19/14

Monday 09/15/14

U.S. Shanghaied in Smithfield Deal?
Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow said reiterated her concerns Monday that legislation is needed to protect American companies from foreign acquisition after a PBS report over the weekend examined the role of the Chinese government in the purchase of Smithfield Foods to Shuanghui International last year.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 10:07PM CDT 09/15/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (4)
Not to be sarcastic, what is the difference? The subject country has control of the equipment needed to process, transport, refrigerate and market the food supply. Control of the processing and ownership of this company is only a miniscule part of the issue. Hard to believe, without the Chinese, this nation couldn't operate a cash register.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:39AM CDT 09/16/14
Bonnie ;This company also owns the pigs.
Posted by melvin meister at 7:15AM CDT 09/16/14
America's are free to buy pigs anytime if they wish to do so. You will see herd expansion to supply U.S. market only if it is deemed a profitable opportunity.
Posted by MS at 4:21PM CDT 09/16/14
How about the banks, Melvin? Could this be defined as a monopoly?
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 7:31PM CDT 09/16/14

Friday 09/12/14

Route 66: The End of the Trail
Much like the diversity and changing scenery across every state, farmers had mixed views on the relationship between tourism and agriculture along the fabled ribbon of concrete and asphalt. Some farmers had no contact or interest in either the tourism or the history of Route 66 while others were fairly engaged.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 6:16AM CDT 09/12/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (2)
I drove the highway from Arizona to California in summer of 1974. The locals called it 'Bloody 66' since it was so crowded and dangerous at night, being only a 2 lane road at the time.
Posted by Vince Moye at 7:19AM CDT 09/12/14
Vince, There were a couple of guys who recalled how crowded the highway had become in the 1970s before the four-lane went in. A rancher in Arizona also had been a deputy in his earlier career and talked about all the criminals he came across along the highway as well.
Posted by CHRIS CLAYTON at 10:03AM CDT 09/12/14

Tuesday 09/09/14

House Votes to Block EPA WOTUS Rule
The House of Representatives voted Tuesday to block EPA's proposed rule defining waters of the United States, siding with farmers and business groups who have argued for months that the EPA rule amounts to regulatory overreach.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 8:56PM CDT 09/09/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (4)
Thank you Congress for understanding ambiguity is not the solution to pollution.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 4:50AM CDT 09/10/14
One might ask why we still don't have a clear definition of a wetland. It's also curious how people commonly criticize NRCS/USDA the agency but heap praise on their local NRCS staff. Sort of like Congress.
Posted by chris jones at 9:02AM CDT 09/11/14
"House of Representatives voted to block" What a shock,,,, do they actual do anything else?
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 12:11PM CDT 09/11/14
EPA is the new home of the communist party and a favorite tool of Kommandant Obama to issue orders.
Posted by GORDON KEYES at 10:39AM CDT 09/12/14

Monday 09/08/14

Vilsack on Easements, Rail and Livestock Aid
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack rolled out some enrollment details Monday of the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program (ACEP), a program in the 2014 farm bill that combined several earlier easement programs into a single program.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 4:27PM CDT 09/08/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (2)
So the ACEP cost the goverment 2542.00 dollars an acre? 328 million divided by 129,000 acres.870,000 dollars per project.
Posted by Raymond Simpkins at 8:00PM CDT 09/09/14
And yet another pipeline construction project halted. In Mn. the Commission, 3 DFLers, 2 Reps. voted 3 to 2 to recommend up to 6 alternate routes for the proposed route. It will now again take years to wade through the bureaucratic boondoggle. Warren buffet and Obamma will be happy. Then the R.R.s get the blame for the transportation issue.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:26AM CDT 09/16/14
Base Acre Decisions Are Key to New Farm Bill
An update from a farm-bill conference in Kansas City last week: Farmers and landlords likely are still going through decisions on base acres. One word of advice from an economist to farmers: Base-acre reallocation and yield update decisions reside with the landowner. If you haven't heard from your landlords on base-acre decisions, you should give them a call. Your landlords might not have any idea what exactly those letters from the Farmer Service Agency were about. You may need to walk them through some of those decisions if you haven't already.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 9:54AM CDT 09/08/14 by Chris Clayton | 0 Comments | Post a Comment

Friday 09/05/14

House Likely to Block EPA's WOTUS Rule
It is increasingly likely that the House will take up legislation to block the Environmental Protection Agency from issuing a "waters of the United States"rule to clarify the scope of the Clean Water Act, a step that could give EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers greater regulatory reach over a greater number of acres.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 3:43PM CDT 09/05/14 by Chris Clayton | Post a Comment
Comments (20)
Watch for the Enviro"s, flying their solar powered jets, flocking to D.C. on the way to Amsterdam, on this one. Keep up the letters, Food Producers.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:28AM CDT 09/06/14
What would you expect from the obstructionist party of dirty air and water?
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 6:51AM CDT 09/08/14
I don't know where you live Jay, but I don't see or here of big problems on farms. What I do have problems with is when EPA issues permits for millions of gallons of the offshore drilling, oil fracking, oil barges truckloads of salt on streets entering untreated storm sewers. The key is concentration, when things are big, big problems happen. This is clearly a land grab. This is private property, the key to freedom and liberty. It is nice to see some people still stand for property rights, without will not remain what it means to be America. We don't need people that know nothing about our farms with "crackerjacks box degrees" that have been brain washed by professors that have only operated in a test tube environment, not the "real world". This is clearly a UN agenda to take away our agricultural competitiveness away.
Posted by Unknown at 8:13AM CDT 09/08/14
Welcome back Jay, where you been? Off schooling all the democrats that are about to roll on their convictions just to get votes I imagine. What, no rant on how great your farm, that your dad made into what it is, while driving your electric car all over the world? If you are coming back try coming back with more than a little politically slanted snippet.
Posted by CRAIG MOORE at 8:47AM CDT 09/08/14
It is quite obvious to me that several of the commenters on this blog need to research the reasoning behind the EPA proposal before commenting further. Start with a look at the Chesapeake Bay pollution clean up project and the recent loss of potable water for the city of Toledo. The question is not whether you are personally OK but what effects excess fertilizer, chemicals, and waste have on the environment downstream. It's a requirement to consider the impositions your choices have on others who have to live with the effects of your decisions. Maybe the EPA's actions are perceived as excessive by those who will have to change but that does not mean it is the wrong action. Maybe a slap in the face? Are we denying again what our actions cummulatively have on the earth as a whole? It is depressing when the Farm Bureau and weak congressional representatives immediately wail about the EPA without acknowledging the problem or seeking reasonable solutions. I am not excited about more regulation, but how about an intelligent discussion about the realities of this issue? Can we do that in the USA anymore?
Posted by Don Thompson at 10:25AM CDT 09/08/14
I'm sorry Don, I don't think you are getting the point. We are being blamed for some things the cities are contributing to. I think before any of these gov't agencies step foot on private property they should have to have a warrant. Plain and simple, also Don are you a farmer or a gov't employee trying to justify your job.
Posted by Unknown at 1:41PM CDT 09/08/14
Seriously? You know what pollution comes from the city and that from other? The "dead area" in the Gulf comes from fertilizers and chemicals originating on farms and yards, which is my point, the effects are cumulative from all sources. If you are attempting to imply that rural residents do not contribute then you have lost credibility. For what its worth, all my govt. employee time was spent in the volunteer military. How about you, unknown?
Posted by Don Thompson at 4:42PM CDT 09/08/14
I'm glad you brought up the dead zone in the gulf. A couple of years ago I was at a drainage meeting that had 3 professors from a land grant university. They had a presentation that depicted a map of the world depicting hypoxia. Their map did show the US Gulf of Mexico one of the worst in the world. After the presentation I asked why all of the other countries and continents including South America and Russia did not have as bad of problems and they actually have more drainage and less regulation. All 3 professors were speechless for awhile until one of them answer maybe because of the "lack of current in the Gulf of Mexico". It seems it is easy to point the finger at the minority of the population that farm, because it seems simply because we are the minority. Yet at the same time every major city outlets their untreated storm sewage into a water way. I will drink anytime from a tile outlet before a city storm sewer outlet, how about you Don? Oh and by the way are you a farmer?
Posted by Unknown at 7:26PM CDT 09/08/14
Don, The neocons of today are far from the old school conservatives. While I disagree with them as well they at least held on to self-responibility. The old school felt responsible for their community, their churches and to help the poor. The neocons of today feel victimized and are puppets of the corporations and hate radio hosts. They deny not only dead zones in the gulf but other scientific issues such as climate change and peak oil. The old school conservative I knew would say to take care of your own problems not "well if China can do it so can we" attitude, like they are jealous for countries that drink sewer water because there are few restrictions. First of all many 3rd world countries do have restrictions despite the neocon fantasy stereotype and secondly I don't really wish to have dead zones in the gulf, rivers that stink and unbreathable air! Yeah Cities make pollution, suburbia makes pollution but farmers do as well and that is what is being discussed here! And BTW unknown, what does it matter if Don is or isn't a farmer?
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 8:26AM CDT 09/09/14
Jay, I don't believe the argument here is whether one should drink from a drainage tile or a sewer pipe. We are fortunate in this country that previous requirements even allow us to consider drinking from a drainage tile. In the majority of other countries, it would be unthinkable. That said, obviously more work is required. I don't get the minority argument. Environmental issues are prominent across the total economy, farm and non-farm. "Farmers" who do not practice environmentally sensitive standards are a dying breed since they can not survive in a world that demands they do. I suggest the ag community becomes a part of the solution as opposed to the seemingly never ending chorus of "woe me". Show a little leadership. BTW Jay, We are purchasing a solar array to power the grain setup and shop with the help of a USDA grant. Gotta love that USDA offering help to us "minorities". Got the idea from your previous posts. Thanks for the heads up.
Posted by Don Thompson at 12:18PM CDT 09/09/14
I am sorry you need someone to tell you how to run your farm. Allowing some drainage because they had it before and others are told it is bad and that they can't install it, how is that not discrimination and how is that scientific. Everyone needs to play by the same rules. That does not happen however. If we allow gov't agencies to pass law without due process, how are we any different from a socialistic or communist gov't? If we allow different people to make "case by case" rulings how is that legal? I had heard a Senator's advisor lately state "we have passed a farm bill now we are writing the rules" , that is not the intensions of our constitution and is simply an abuse of power. I am truly concerned by your lack of concern.
Posted by Unknown at 7:15PM CDT 09/09/14
Jay and Don, You should actually get involved in some scientific research, rather than relying on special interest Enviro groups being promoted by the liberal press. I have not read a word anywhere stating Farm Bureau or any food producer denying any responsibility for the problem. There are several land locked lakes in Minneapolis, Mn. with hypoxic layers do to road salt, chlorine and other municipal run-offs. In our water shed, several lakes were declared impaired by the PCA due to high chlorine counts. Farmers in the Chesapeake Bay area have corrected the practices under the direction of government agencies, but yet the problem is still present while residential destruction booms. Has anyone actually identified the sources of Lake Erie issues? Not what I have read. Only finger pointing by those who deny their own contribution to the problem. A couple of you need to look in the mirror to see the deniers.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:19AM CDT 09/10/14
Bonnie, You have recognized and accepted that there is a water pollution issue but you continue to deny any culpability on the part of ag. It is delusional to think that is possible. Everyone has a part in this and everyone needs to accept responsibility. Congress just passed the buck again to future generations. Please accept that not every expression of fact or opinion that you disagree with and are reluctant to hear, is somehow a left wing plot to destroy Bonnie D and all her conservative pals. In our district, the far right Congressperson is attending multiple Farm Bureau meetings using the EPA as her punching bag and getting the reds all riled up again over any form of government role. How about solving a problem that needs a solution?
Posted by Don Thompson at 7:08AM CDT 09/10/14
I think you are missing the point Don. EPA already has ability to regulate pesticide along with fertilizer application. This is about land use on private property in which is a right protected by the US Constitution. That is why the Supreme Court stated they are overreaching. Now the House is doing its job to try to reign them in. No government agency has the right to write law. There are other countries that allow that and certainly a person can move to one of them if you don't like the US Constitution.
Posted by Unknown at 7:55AM CDT 09/10/14
I believe I understand the point entirely. There is a problem that needs attention. Fellow citizens of our country believe an effort of this scope is needed to solve it. It may come to that. Personally, I hope we address it in a cooperative manner that is brought on in a well thought out manner. Denying that we in rural USA are not a part of the problem and contending that there is a conspiracy against us because we feel superior to our urban cousins leaves us with no credibility. Property rights are like freedom of speech. When your speech or actions harm others, there may be limits. You can argue about the extent of that as you wish.
Posted by Don Thompson at 8:26AM CDT 09/10/14
I understand you are trying to have the last word. I stand by my comments. There are rules now for pesticide and fertilizer application. The Supreme Court has ruled. Please stick to the subject.
Posted by Unknown at 8:58AM CDT 09/10/14
Unknown, You need to read the Supreme Court EPA opinion again. I believe you have missed the boat there - and that is the last word!
Posted by Don Thompson at 10:54AM CDT 09/10/14
Sorry Don, I have not denied anything. We have not accepted anything, we were taught by our Grandparents to care for the land that feeds the world. We also attempt continued education, as many producers do also. You, too often reach conclusions without reading other contributions from readers. Please read consider my previous statement. Many food producers are continually trying too improve their practices, while too much residential destruction continues without safeguards.(Foe example) In order to obtain a feedlot permit in Mn., one needs to meet the rules and regulations. Period. You deniers are a piece of work!
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:02PM CDT 09/10/14
Grandparents had a half dozen sows, 10 milk cows, 50 chickens, 60 acres much of which was in hay the balance was fertilized by home grown manure and a couple 200lbs of 2-6-6, no herbicides,,, Yeah they didn't need a feedlot permit, much freer then without government regs!
Posted by Jay Mcginnis at 9:17AM CDT 09/11/14
And isn't it sad the grandparents would now need a feedlot permit? Only if you would set an example and do the same, Jay.
Posted by Bonnie Dukowitz at 5:25PM CDT 09/12/14
Clarifying Some SCO Issues
Following my article on Thursday about some policy discussions regarding ARC, PLC and SCO, I got an email from the Risk Management Agency informing me some items needed clarification.[Read Full Blog Post]
Posted at 9:53AM CDT 09/05/14 by Chris Clayton | 0 Comments | Post a Comment
Blog Home Pages
September  2013
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30               
Subscribe to Ag Policy Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • CRP, Base Acres and Proof for Yield Updates
  • Business Groups: Withdraw WOTUS Rule
  • Base Acre and ARC-PLC Deadlines Reported
  • Photo Fees on Public Lands? C'Mon, Man!
  • USDA ARC-PLC Rollout and Decision Tools for Farmers
  • Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
  • Point, Counterpoint on EPA's Waters of the U.S. Rule
  • Senate Committee Passes Railroad Regulatory Bill
  • U.S. Shanghaied in Smithfield Deal?
  • Route 66: The End of the Trail
  • House Votes to Block EPA WOTUS Rule
  • Vilsack on Easements, Rail and Livestock Aid
  • Base Acre Decisions Are Key to New Farm Bill
  • House Likely to Block EPA's WOTUS Rule
  • Clarifying Some SCO Issues
  • Senators Want GIPA Policy Limits Removed
  • EPA Water Rule Starts in the Ephemeral Streams
  • Looking at Base Acre Decisions Facing Farmers
  • Report: U.S. Lost WTO Ruling
  • NFU Leaders Want to Walk Away from Beef Talks