Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik DTN Markets Editor

Friday 11/30/12

Error Emphasizes Lack of SRW Demand

CME Group announced on Friday that it issued an erroneous report on wheat available for physical settlement of futures contracts. At 4 p.m. on Thursday, CME said there were 146 shipping certificates registered, but at 5:46 p.m. corrected the report to reflect another 2,000 shipping certificates from the Andersons' Conant (Maumee, Ohio) and Illinois facilities.

That error is the equivalent of five Panamax ships of soft red winter wheat, roughly 10 million bushels, and traders that used the initial data to place trades got burned by the revision.

"And the spread's getting pulverized today because of it," said Tregg Cronin, a market analyst for CHS Hedging Inc. "The December-to-March Chicago wheat calendar spread is just getting -- I mean it's down 25% on the day."

CME said in a press release it will assume responsibility for the trading losses associated with the reporting error, however, it's unclear what those may be.

The bigger factor in the spread's price action, however, is likely the decreasing water levels on the Mississippi River, Cronin said. Barge supplies are tight as the grain terminals on the Mississippi River rush to send everything downriver before water levels become prohibitively low.

"That's had a big effect, and I would argue a majority of the reason why we've seen deliveries," Cronin said. "If the river were operational and everything, there'd be demand for owning those receipts and I don’t think you would have seen it blow out quite as bad as it was. Whether or not any of that was tied to the Andersons and the misreporting, it's hard to say, but that's why it's taken on so much focus because the river is in such rough shape."

DTN Senior Analyst Darin Newsom agrees the bigger picture is the large number of delivery registrations, reflective of the overall lack of demand that prompted commercial owners to move supplies into storage.

"Why the lack of demand? A couple of different reasons: U.S. wheat is still too high priced on world export market, particularly with the recent strength of the U.S. dollar. And second, low river levels are making it difficult to move grain to Gulf ports. Is the boo-boo affecting trade in Chicago wheat Friday? Maybe a little as the Dec-to-March carry continues to strengthen. Does it change the long-term fundamental outlook of the market? No, not really. The old-crop outlook has been neutral to bearish for some time now, and this doesn’t change that," Newsom said.

Posted at 3:33PM CST 11/30/12 by Katie Micik
Post a Blog Comment:
Your Comment:
DTN reserves the right to delete comments posted to any of our blogs and forums, for reasons including profanity, libel, irrelevant personal attacks and advertisements.
Blog Home Pages
April  2014
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30         
Subscribe to Market Matters Blog RSS
Recent Blog Posts
  • Regulators Are People, Too
  • Observations of a Weary Traveler
  • Baseball Season Opens, But River, Head of Lakes Grain Season Still on Break
  • Overbooked China Diverts Shipments to the U.S.
  • Parts of Ag Confidence Index Show Correlation to Corn Prices
  • Ag Confidence Index Foreshadows Things to Come
  • Rail Service Slow to Recover
  • CME Shifts to Variable Daily Limits
  • Intuitive, with the Potential for Confusion
  • Mom, the Mini-Wheats!
  • Crimea River: Rumblings of War in the Grain Markets
  • One Cancellation Down, How Many More to Come?
  • Can Crop Insurance Guarantees Sway Acreage?
  • PED Virus Could Trim Corn Consumption
  • Barge, Rail Logistics Still Plagued By Snow, Ice
  • Prepare for a Data, Demographic Deluge
  • Let the Acreage Debate Begin
  • Mother Nature Still Affecting River, Rail Logistics
  • Logistics Still a Mess on Rivers, U.S. and Canadian Rails
  • Freight Rates Easing